Take_101 - 8万比特币之谜

我们手头有个关于比特币的谜团。

We have a bit of a Bitcoin mystery on our hands.

8万枚比特币。

80,000 Bitcoin.

价值约86亿美元的比特币就这么被转移了。

Just a casual 8.6 ish billion dollars worth of Bitcoin just moved.

会不会是某个早期巨鲸？

Now was it an old whale?

回溯调查发现这些币已经持有了十四年？

Just going back and digging into did they just hold for fourteen years?

但实际上，移动这些币的似乎并非原始持有者。

Well, it actually appears that it was not the original owner of those coins who has now moved them.

操作返回消息中，地址生成方式的异常特征，以及与《迷失》剧中世界末日数字序列的神秘关联——这真是个诡异的谜团。

In op return messages, in weird quirks about how the addresses were generated, and peculiar connections to the sequence of numbers in the old show Lost that suggested the end of the world, This is a really bizarre mystery.

这些交易的op_return字段包含律师事务所链接和所有权声明，称若能提供证明币属他人的私钥，可在截止日前赎回。

The op return of these transactions have a link to a law firm with an owner notice, a claim that if they can offer the private key showing that these are coins that belong to somebody else, that they can be redeemed if they do it before a certain date.

诸多迹象表明移动这些币的并非原始主人。

Numerous things that suggest the original owner is not the one moving these coins.

那么比特币是否存在重大加密漏洞？

So is there a major cryptographic vulnerability in Bitcoin?

大量旧地址是否真的易受此类攻击？

Are tons of old addresses actually susceptible to this?

中本聪的币是否面临风险？

Are Satoshi's coins at risk?

量子计算是否刚刚破坏了比特币系统的某些部分？

Did quantum just break something in Bitcoin's system?

这是一次极力伪装成合法行为的黑客攻击，还是有人偶然发现了一个存有价值90亿美元比特币的旧钱包？

Is this a hack that's trying really hard to look legitimate, or did somebody just happen upon an old wallet with $9,000,000,000 worth of Bitcoin in it?

今天，我们将进行一些调查和探索，试图解开这8万枚比特币的神秘面纱。

Well, today, we're gonna do a little bit of digging, a little investigating, and we're gonna see if we can't come up with an answer to the 80,000 Bitcoin mystery.

现在是《Guy's Take》节目时间。

It's time for a Guy's Take episode.

大家好，最近怎么样？

What is up, guys?

欢迎回到节目。

Welcome back to the show.

我是盖伊·斯旺，一个比你认识的所有人都更了解比特币的人，这里是《比特币可听》。

I am Guy Swan, the guy who has read more about Bitcoin than anybody else you know, and this is Bitcoin Audible.

在这里，你将学习关于比特币的一切——健全货币、经济学、哲学、密码朋克和互联网的历史，以及所有相关的内容。

This is where you learn all about Bitcoin, about sound money, the economics, the philosophy, the history of cypherpunks and the Internet, everything and anything around it.

我们会深入探讨这些话题。

We cover it here and we do a deep dive.

说到这个，我们为那些喜欢和我一起钻研技术细节的极客们准备了一些非常酷的技术内容。

And actually, on that note, we've got a really cool technical stuff for all the nerds out there who love to really dig into the nit and gritty with me.

有一篇非常有趣的文章。

There's a really fun article.

我的意思是，它其实不算真正的技术细节。

It's I mean, it's not really the nit and gritty.

我们不会做太严肃的事情。

We're not gonna do something too serious.

但是，有一种新的签名聚合方案已被证实可以与比特币原生曲线配合使用。

But, there is a new signature aggregation scheme that has been proven that actually worked with Bitcoin's native curve.

他们刚刚发布了Kiara Bickers（我记得是这个名字）在《比特币杂志》上的一篇文章，我们将重点讨论这篇文章。

And they just released a Kiara Bickers, I believe it was, released an article on Bitcoin Magazine, and we'll be doing that article.

其实我已经为它录好了音频。

I actually already did the audio for it.

只是还没把节目剪辑好。

I just haven't put the episode together.

不过我们会请一位专家来解析，帮助大家理解。

But we'll have a guy's take kind of breaking it down to try to make sense of it.

内容确实偏技术向，但非常精彩，这实际上是个重大突破。

It's definitely on the technical side, but it's fascinating, and it's actually a really, really big step.

这真的很酷。

It's a really cool thing.

顺便说明一下，签名聚合与多重签名是两回事。

And just so you know, for anybody confused about this, signature aggregation is not multisig.

我们不是在讨论那种需要三分之二签名的机制，比如你、我，或者再加上BTC sessions中的某个人。

We're not talking about, like, we need, you know, two of three, like, you, me, out of you, me, and, you know, I don't know, BTC sessions.

需要我们中的两个人签名才能动用资金。

We need two of us to sign in order to release the coins.

这完全是不同的概念。

This is very different.

这将是我签署我的交易和输入，本签署他的交易、输出和输入，而你签署你的交易和输入，但我们把所有内容整合在一起，实际上只需在链上放置一个合并签名，这样我们就能汇集交易并节省费用。

This would be me signing my transaction and my input, Ben signing his transaction and his put and input, and you signing your transaction and your input, but us putting it all together and actually only having to put one combined signature on chain so that we can just pool our transaction and save money.

有趣的是，这对CoinJoin等隐私标准来说是巨大福音，因为当你添加大量不同签名和不同输入时，CoinJoin成本会高得多——毕竟这些成本是大家分摊的，而签名确实是交易中开销较大的部分。

And interestingly, this is a huge boon for things like CoinJoin and any and all privacy standards because CoinJoin costs a lot more when you add tons of different signatures and tons of different inputs together because you're all sharing this cost, and signatures are really kind of the heavy part of transactions.

在这种情况下，CoinJoin实际上会更高效。

Well, in this case, CoinJoins would actually be more efficient.

这是我们节目中讨论过的话题。

They would be this is something we've talked about on the show.

这就是为什么我对Taproot如此兴奋，尽管签名聚合方案尚未完全实现Taproot的所有功能。

This is why I was so excited about Taproot even though the signature aggregation scheme has has yet to even be fulfilled with with everything around Taproot.

所以看到这个真的很棒。

So it's really cool to see this.

顺便说一句，这个新方案被称为Dahlias。

This is referred to as Dahlias, by the way, this new scheme.

这是由Blockstream的两名工程师和Ledger的另一位工程师共同完成的论文，并已得到验证。

And it was two engineers from Blockstream and then also another from Ledger who put this paper together and has demonstrated this.

现在它需要一个软分叉来实现。

Now it would require a soft fork.

但最酷的是它不仅效率极高，还不需要任何新的密码学假设。

But the really cool thing is not only is it super inefficient, it also doesn't require any major new cryptographic assumptions.

它基本上建立在完全相同的技术基础上。

It basically builds off the exact same thing.

重申一下，这就是比特币的原生曲线。

Again, it's Bitcoin's native curve.

这本质上只是验证过程的一种不同方式，因此需要一套新的共识规则或验证系统。

It's just a different way of essentially doing the verification process, which is why it would need a new consensus new new set of consensus rules or system for verifying it.

但它完全兼容比特币当前的运作方式。

But it's built entirely compatible with the way Bitcoin is today.

或许这实际上是一条通往软分叉的道路，能带来极其显著的益处，最终实现比特币在功能、效率和安全性的重大提升——这些改进我认为是长期以来备受期待的，而过去实施的软分叉和其他改进都是为了逐步实现这一目标。

So maybe maybe that actually is a road to a soft fork with a really, really significant benefit and something that could finally realize a really cool feature and efficiency and security improvement to Bitcoin that I feel like has been highly desirable for a really long time and the other improvements and, you know, soft forks that have been made in the past were really geared around hopefully getting to this point.

所以这确实非常酷，值得深入研究。

So it's just a really cool thing, and it's gonna be worth digging into, I think.

我们将在节目中详细解读。

So we will be reading that on the show.

但今天我们要讨论的是这个惊人的8万比特币谜团。

But today, we have this crazy 80,000 Bitcoin mystery.

在开始之前，我要特别感谢Chroma对节目的支持。

And before we get into it, I just want to shout out Chroma for supporting the show.

他们是赞助商，同时也拥有一些很棒的产品。

They are a sponsor, and they also have some amazing products.

如果你还没接触过'光健康'这个领域——起初我也持怀疑态度，直到我和妻子严格执行了全套方案：让所有屏幕在特定时间切换成红光模式。

If you haven't gone down the kind of lighthealth rabbit hole, it's actually been fascinating to me, and I was kinda skeptical at first until my wife and I actually were extremely regimented and strict about putting this all together properly, about getting all of our screens to go red at a certain time of day.

她会在固定时间佩戴防蓝光眼镜。

And she wears her her nightshades, her her, like, blue light blocking glasses at a particular time.

我现在也订购了自己的眼镜。

And I I actually have mine on the way now.

最让我震惊的是效果——它极大改善了我们的睡眠质量，尤其对我这种长期失眠、深夜莫名清醒的人效果显著。

And it's it's just been I was shocked at the how much it changed and how much it has affected me and her, especially in, like, the ability to get to sleep or me being, like, kind of an insomniac and having energy late at night for no reason.

这让我能够调整并保持昼夜节律的平衡。

That has been being able to kind of shift and having my circadian rhythm feel in balance.

你一定要看看这些家伙的产品。

You gotta check these guys out.

这就是他们产品的核心理念。

This is what their products are about.

关注荷尔蒙与光健康——他们有一系列超棒的产品值得体验。

It's about having good hormone and light health, and they have a ton of really cool products to check out.

使用折扣码Bitcoin Audible可享9折优惠（详见节目备注），他们还在特制网站上接受比特币支付。

And I have you a 10% discount with code Bitcoin Audible, which you'll find right down in the show notes, and they accept Bitcoin on a special based website.

相关链接同样能在下方找到。

That link, will also find right down there.

特别鸣谢人权基金会HRF及其《财务自由报告》——不仅因为他们杰出的工作，更荣幸他们认可本节目值得支持。

Also, shout out to HRF, the Human Rights Foundation, and their financial freedom report for not only just the amazing work that they do, but also, I'm honored that they thought my show was was worth supporting.

我们刚与CK进行了精彩对话，深入探讨了他们开展的卓越工作、芬尼自由奖及其发展基金。

We actually just had a fantastic conversation with CK all about the insane work that they do over there and the Finney Freedom Award and their development fund.

你会发现大量详细信息。

There's lots of details that you'll find.

强烈建议收听那期访谈（如果还没听的话）。

I urge you to listen to that chat episode if you haven't.

所有详情、链接及订阅他们通讯的方式都在那里。

But also just all the details and links and stuff to check that out and to sign up for their newsletter.

极力推荐。

Highly, highly recommended.

它们也正确地出现在节目注释中。

And they are right in the show notes as well.

最后，通过同义词的公钥，特别是公钥环。

And lastly, pub key by synonym and particularly the pubkey ring.

我希望你能感受到他们的密钥系统有多么神奇，以及它的强大之处——如果你有一个任何人都能找到或直接指向你任何内容、任何你想要的信息的地址，无论你的托管方式如何，且无人能将其关闭。

I want you to get a feel for how amazing their key system is and how powerful it could be if you had an address that anybody could find or direct to any of your content, any information that you wanted, whatever your hosting is, and nobody could shut it down.

它就在BitTorrent网络中可用，任何人都无能为力。

That it was just available in the BitTorrent network, there was nothing anybody could do.

如果有人想通过你的ID、你的公钥找到你，任何人都能做到。

And if somebody wanted to find you by your ID, by your public key, anybody could.

这就是去中心化主权网络的力量。

That is the power of a decentralized sovereign web.

而它轻量、简单且模块化的特性，意味着这里正在构建一些非常非常酷的东西。

And the fact that this is lightweight and simple and modular, there's something really, really cool being built here.

我建议你去看看。

And I suggest you check it out.

我参与PUBKEY测试版已有一段时间，他们刚刚发布，你可以访问他们的网站。

I've been on the PUBKEY beta for a while and they just released it so that you can go to their website.

链接和详情都在节目注释中。

The link and details are in the show notes.

我会把我的PUBKEY放在那里，这样你可以关注我，给我留言，告诉我你的想法。

And I will have my PUBKEY up there so that you can follow me and give me a shout out and tell me what you think.

好的。

Alright.

让我们深入探讨这8万比特币的谜团。

Let's go ahead and get into this 80,000 Bitcoin mystery.

那么具体细节是什么呢？

So what are the details here?

有一批不同地址都持有完全相同的余额——1万比特币，我一直在深入研究门罗币。

A bunch of different addresses with the exact same balance, 10,000 Bitcoin, that have had I went and, you know, I've been digging through menpol.

这里有些空间，而且有很多随机的交易被发送到这些地址。

Space here, and there's a bunch of just, like, random, you know, transactions being sent to them.

基本上，多年来所有的垃圾攻击和小额手续费交易都被发往这些地址。

Basically, all the spam attacks and the little, like, tiny fee stuff have been sent to them over the years.

所以现在余额比最初的1万比特币略多，但那原始的1万比特币始终未曾移动过。

So there's, a little bit more than the the original 10,000 Bitcoin, but the 10,000, that original 10,000 Bitcoin has not moved the entire time.

这实际上是这个谜题的重要线索，因为这些地址从未被花费过——至少在我目前查看的这些是这样。

And that's an important piece of this puzzle actually because none of these addresses have been spent from or at least the ones that I've got open right now and looked into.

关键问题是：这些地址是否被花费过？还是说这些UTXO真的十四年来一直未被触碰？

That was a that was a big thing is I wanna know have these been spent from or had these literally been addresses unused just as UTXOs sitting there untouched for literally fourteen years?

确实如此。

And they have.

其中两个地址创建于2011年4月，还有五六个（我记得）是2011年5月的。

Two of them are from April 2011 and five of them or six of them, I think, are from May 2011.

每个地址同样都是1万比特币。

And again, 10,000 Bitcoin each.

所以每个地址价值约10亿美元。

So about a billion dollars in each address.

这要么是一位长期持有、从未动过这些币的传奇HODLER，要么就是丢失的币。

This is either a legendary HODLER who has not touched them for this entire time or lost coins.

这其中很大一部分问题在于，你如何判断或何时认定币已经丢失？

And that's like a huge part of this is that, you know, how do you how do you determine or when do you call coins lost?

因为我确实见过一些人从2010、2011年就开始持有，从未动过他们的币，突然有一天决定要做些什么，或者只是转移到新钱包，甚至从未转入交易所。

Because I have absolutely seen people who have been holding from 2010, 2011, never moved their coins suddenly wake up and decide they wanna do something with them, or they just move them to a new setup, and they never even get, you know, sent to an exchange or anything.

但这些币显然还在那里。

But they are clearly there.

它们确实存在。

They clearly exist.

事实上，在假中本聪（fake Toshi）声称某些地址属于他的那个时期。

In fact, during the whole fake Toshi era when fake Toshi claimed certain addresses as belonging to his or belonging to him.

实际上，如果我没记错的话，应该是其中之一。

And in fact, I think it was one of these, if I'm not mistaken.

我看到有人发帖讨论过这个。

I saw somebody post about this.

然而其中一个地址竟然被列在假中本聪所谓的郁金香信托（Tulip Trust）里，这再次证明他完全是在胡编乱造。

Yet one of these addresses is actually in listed in the supposed Tulip Trust of fake Toshi, which just another confirmation that he just made all this crap up.

但在另一个完全不相关的事件中，当他自称是中本聪时，人们发现那个长期休眠的地址正是克雷格·怀特（Craig Wright）声称属于他的假中本聪地址。

But one of the other ones in a totally unrelated situation when he was claiming to be Satoshi, and it was noticed that that address that had been dormant for all of this time was fake Toshi that Craig Wright had claimed that this belonged to him.

其中一个地址在转移时附带了一条OP_RETURN消息，写着'克雷格·怀特不是中本聪'。

One of those addresses moved with an op return message that said Craig Knight Craig Wright is not Satoshi.

所以这确实挺有意思的。

So that was that was pretty cool.

我是说，当时应该很明显这一切都是他一手策划的彻头彻尾的骗局。

I mean, it should have been obvious then that all of this was, just a total fraud by him.

但事实上，其中一笔资金竟然出现在郁金香信托里，这又为这个小故事增添了几分荒诞色彩。

But the fact that this one of these actually shows up in the Tulip Trust is also just like another funny, piece of that little story.

不过确实。

But yeah.

所以这家伙之前是个大庄家，然后今天突然心血来潮决定转移他的币？

So is this guy just massive holder and then now, today, randomly, he decides to move his coins?

看起来不像。

Doesn't seem like it.

看起来转移这些币的人并非原主。

It seems like the person who is moving these coins is not the original owner.

现在问题来了：这个人是怎么拿到私钥的？

So now the question is, how did this person get the private keys?

喏，这就是其中一笔。

And so here's one of them.

你看到的这是1万枚比特币。

So this is 10,000 Bitcoin you see here.

这笔交易是在3号转出的。

So this is the transaction that went out on the third.

这发生在短短五天前——准确说是2025年7月3日，四天前。

So this was just five days ago four days ago on 07/03/2025.

你会注意到在2号和6月30日，还有另外三笔金额非常非常小的交易。

And you'll notice on the second and then the June 30, there were three other transactions in very, very small amounts.

值得注意的是，这些内容附带了一个包含详细信息的操作返回。

And important to note is that these this had an op return with details.

因此第一项显示的是法律声明。

So the first one shows legal notice.

我们已经接管了这个钱包及其内容物。

We have taken possession of this wallet and its contents.

这是一份公开声明，表明我们拥有此物，你知道，基本上就像法律领域那样，如果你公开声明这是你的，并希望获得所谓的'法律权利'。

So this is a public notice that we own this, you you know, basically just like a legal domain that if you are publicly declaring that this is yours and you want, quote, unquote, legal rights to it.

这是弃置原则。

This is the abandonment doctrine.

这至少在我看来像是一份法律辩护，表明这是我们由法律团队支持的公开声明，宣称我们对此拥有所有权。

This is this is this looks like a legal at least to me, this looks like a legal defense that says, here is our public declaration from with, you know, our legal team backing it that we have claimed ownership of this.

如果你是真正的合法所有者，必须主动站出来。

And if you are the right owner rightful owner, you must come forth.

然后他们正在思考其司法管辖区内的任何法律先例，或者可能正在建立自己的法律先例，因为目前比特币领域还没有真正的先例。

And then they're musing whatever legal precedent is in their jurisdiction, or maybe they're just kind of setting up their own legal precedent because there isn't really precedent for this yet when it comes to Bitcoin.

这样可以吗？

Is it okay.

我们正在确立这些条款。

We are establishing this these terms.

我们正将此完全提供给你们。

We are making this fully available to you.

我们正在尽可能公开地发布这一声明。

We are publishing this as publicly as we possibly can.

这关乎以合法方式取得这些币的所有权，他们似乎认为或希望这是一种合法途径，使得这些币‘理应’归他们所有，并且他们已经充分通知了原主人——他们希望原主人显然已放弃这些币，以便他们能获取。

This is about taking ownership of these coins in a legitimate and what they appear to think or probably hope a legal way so that it rightfully, quote, unquote, belongs to them, and they have sufficiently given notice to the the original owner who has clearly who they hope has abandoned these coins so that they can acquire.

但这里还有一点古怪之处。

But there's another another little bit of oddity in this.

我看到几篇文章和人们在猜测这其中有什么超级谜团，觉得这非常疯狂。

And a couple of articles and people I've seen are speculating that there's some super mystery, and this is, like, really crazy.

但这些币被发送出去后，又有一笔基本符合此情况的交易。

But after these coins have been sent out, another transaction from the basically in line with this.

于是这一万个比特币地址被清空，随后又从该地址发出了另一笔带有操作码返回的交易。

So 10,000 the the 10,000 Bitcoin addresses were emptied, and then another transaction from that location was then sent with another op return.

而这一点似乎也存在于每一笔交易中。

And this also appears to be present in every single one of them.

我会返回并分享我的屏幕，这样我们就能看到这个。

I will go back and I'll share my screen so that so that we can see this.

那好吧。

So alright.

再次说明，这是给观看视频的人看的。

So this is again, for people watching the video.

如果你想看视频，这将在Twitter、YouTube以及Nostr原生平台上发布。

If you wanna if you wanna see the video, this will be on Twitter as well as YouTube and Nostr natively.

所以你可以去观看，就能明白我在这里讲的内容。

So you can go watch it and you can see what I'm talking about here.

但就像这样，这是2011年创建的部分，然后它被发送出去。

But like, so here's the so this is the 2011 creation of it and then this sends it out.

它发送了这10,000枚比特币。

And it sends this 10,000 Bitcoin.

他们实际上将这1笔11,000枚比特币的余额拆分成了10,000枚比特币。

They actually broke this 1 11,000 Bitcoin balance into one with 10,000 Bitcoin.

现在你点击这个，它首先发送了全部的10,000枚比特币。

Now you click on this one and this sent first sent all the 10,000 Bitcoin.

这就是转入的部分。

That's the coming in.

当前余额是多少？

What's the current balance?

待处理余额为零吗？

Pending balance zero?

那10,000枚比特币转出到哪里去了？

Where did the 10,000 go out?

哦，那是7.04美元。

Oh that that's $7.00 4.

好的。

Okay.

所以这是10,000枚比特币的转出。

So this was the 10,000 Bitcoin going out.

之后还有两笔额外交易，这使得余额降至仅剩1美元83美分。

And then there were two additional transactions after that, that's bringing this down to there's only a dollar and 83¢.

这个地址里只剩下1,690聪了。

There's only 1,690 sats left in this address.

但还有另一个操作返回包含数字4、8、15、16、23和42。

But there was another op return that has four, eight, fifteen, sixteen, 23, and 42.

这是操作返回中的一个数字序列。

A number sequence in this in the op return.

而且它们似乎都包含这个序列。

And they all seem to have it.

所以这里还有另一个包含10,000的操作返回。

So here's the here's the other one that has the 10,000.

这里显示10,000在2004年7月流出。

So here's the 10,000 going out on 07/2004.

我们将前往该地址查看其操作返回。

So we're gonna go to that address and then look at its op returns.

好的。

And Okay.

这个操作返回里包含两个10k，这很有趣——在操作返回里放这个确实很奇怪。

So this one has two ten k in in in op return, which is a funny it's an odd thing to put in the op return.

不过还是再重复一次。

But just after again.

这里是10,000比特币流出，然后我们又看到另一个。

So here's the 10,000, Bitcoin coming out, and then we have another.

这是一条铭文。

This is an inscription.

其实让我仔细看看那个。

Actually, let me let me look at that one.

我还没注意到那个。

I didn't take a notice of that yet.

那么下一个就有机会了。

Then the next one has the opportune.

再说一遍，4815162342。

Again, 4815162342.

这些数字来自《迷失》那季，它们无处不在，据说，就像是世界末日。

These are the numbers from the season of lost that were showing up all over the place and, like, supposedly, it was, like, the end of the world.

我其实没看过《迷失》，只看过几集之类的，所以大概知道。

I I never actually watched Lost in I I watched a couple of episodes or something, so I had the idea.

但我觉得有趣的是，很多人猜测这是某种谜团或对当前情况的暗示。

But what's interesting to me, a whole bunch of people are speculating that this is some sort of mystery or illusion to what's going on here.

但我几乎怀疑这是否可能与这些地址被发现的方式有关，或者可能与密钥生成有关。

But I almost wonder if this might actually have something more to do with how these addresses were discovered maybe, or or maybe this had something to do with the generation of the of the keys for this.

因为《迷失》是部热门剧，大概在2006到2010年？

Because Lost was a show that was popular in, was it, 2006 to 2010?

所以在这段时间里，当1万比特币转入这些地址时，这串数字本应具有重要文化意义，当时是街头巷尾的热议话题，就像那个时代的《权力的游戏》，这让我怀疑是否有个随机数生成器将其作为熵值用于创建过程，或许是通过这种方式被黑或恢复的。

So it was during the time in which 10,000 Bitcoin went into these addresses that this sequence of numbers would have held significant cultural relevance, and it was kind of the the talk of the town, kind of the Game of Thrones of the era, which makes me wonder if there was, like, some random number generator and this being used as as some entropy in the creation, and maybe this was hacked in that way or this was recovered in this way.

但这也让我想到，如果这是个漏洞，你肯定不希望留着他让别人也能利用这个漏洞获取那些币，因为现在所有人都会盯着这个。

But that also kinda makes me wonder about the whole you know, going back to the idea that if this was an exploit, you really wouldn't want to leave it open for someone else to also get this exploit and then get those coins because now everybody's gonna be looking for this.

如果这些数字很重要，为什么要公开它们？如果这些数字对比特币恢复本身确实重要的话。

And if those numbers are significant, like, why would you publish those numbers if these are actually significant to the recovery of the Bitcoin themselves?

因为你可以展示说，哦，对于曾经持有钱包的人，我们发现这些数字是相关的。

Because, you know, you can maybe show that, oh, for the the person who used to hold the wallets, like, oh, we figured out that these numbers are relevant.

所以，你知道，我们根据这个生成了私钥。

And so, you know, we we generated the private keys based on this.

但如果你在链上公开这些信息，那么人们就会试图使用那些数字。

But if you're giving that information out publicly on the chain, well, then people are gonna be trying to use those numbers.

就像，其他人可能会怀疑这是否是个漏洞利用。

Like like, other people are probably gonna be wondering if this is an exploit.

好的。

Okay.

我需要做什么？

What do I need to?

我有九十天时间。

I've got ninety days.

对吧？

Right?

根据所罗门兄弟的通知，我必须在9月30日或10月5日前证明我拥有私钥，并且这确实是我的余额，这些是我的币。

I've got until or I guess I've got until the September September 30 or October 5 according to the Solomon Brothers notice to prove that I have the I could have the private key as well and that this is actually my balance and these are my coins.

如果这些是你的，你肯定不会希望这种情况发生。

You wouldn't if if these were if these were yours, you wouldn't want that to be the case.

所以如果你刚发现漏洞并进入这个钱包，你既不想透露，也不想给别人时间利用同样的漏洞拿走币或证明币权，否则你将面临关于币归属的法律纠纷。

So if you had just hit an exploit and gotten into this wallet, you would neither want to reveal or give time for someone else to get the exact same exploit and take the coins or prove the coins, and then you now have a big legal battle over whose are they if it's an exploit.

因此你不仅不希望这样，而且除非是与当前情况相关的独家信息，否则你绝不会透露那些关键敏感信息。

So not only do you not want that, but you certainly wouldn't reveal sensitive information that was critical to that unless it was information that only you were using if it was relevant to this.

不过有个有趣的细节暗示可能只是有人在钻研并试图围绕此事构建叙事或传递信息——那个2025年10月5日的截止日期，我马上会详细说明。

There is one interesting caveat about this, though, that does suggest there is just some somebody nerding out and maybe creating a narrative around this or trying to send a message is that the deadline, 10/05/2025, which I'll actually get to in just a second.

这是他们实际追回或认领这些硬币所有权的截止日期，恰好是在《迷失》剧集播出二十年后——那集揭示了这些数字的意义，于2005年10月5日播出。

This is the deadline for them to actually recover or claim ownership of the coins, actually happens to be exactly twenty years after the orientation episode of of The Lost Show, which is the episode where the significance of those numbers are revealed, aired on TV, 10/05/2005.

但无论这些数字意味着什么，都既有趣又有点诡异。

But whatever the significance of that is, it is interesting and a little bit weird.

比如，这些'迷失数字'在整个事件中到底有什么意义？

Like, what was the point of the the lost numbers in all of this one?

最初三笔交易的操作回报全是关于法律公告的，基本上就是公开声明这些硬币的所有权。

The first three op returns for the original transactions were all about legal notice and, you know, basically making public declarations about the ownership of these coins.

所以在那集播出二十年后——就是展示那些数字的剧集——这些数字的意义才被揭示出来。

So and then, of course, the twenty years after the the release of that the episode in which those numbers were shown, there's the significance of those numbers were revealed.

关于这点，我快速读一下公告内容。

Which on that, I'll just read the notice really quick.

这是所罗门兄弟网站上/owner_notice页面的公告，目前似乎无法访问，只显示404错误，就像页面不存在一样。

So so this is the notice on the Solomon Brothers website slash owner underscore notice, which again is seems to be down at the moment, or it just shows a four zero four, like, as if it's not there and there's just a blank website.

所以他们应该是把页面撤下了。

So they've taken it down, I guess.

但公告写着'这个数字钱包似乎已丢失或被遗弃'。

But says this digital wall wallet appears to be lost or abandoned.

'我们的客户已实际占有该钱包，并试图确认——（这里可能不是母语）——试图确认是否存在真实所有者'。

Our client has taken constructive possession of it and is seeks to determine, probably not the first language, and seeks to determine if there is a bona fide owner.

'本法律公告根据适用法律发布并合规，旨在为所有者提供认领财产的机会，否则该财产将被视为丢失或遗弃物品'。

Legal notice is posted pursuant to and in compliance with applicable law, which is intended to provide an opportunity for the owner to claim property otherwise qualifying as lost or abandoned.

'所有者有九十天时间回应本公告'。

The owner is provided ninety days to respond to this notice.

换言之，持有有效所有权证明的拥有者必须在2025年10月5日前作出回应。

In other words, an owner with valid proof of ownership must respond before 10/05/2025.

若未收到回应，数字钱包及其内容将被视为已确认放弃。

If no response is received, the digital wallets and their contents will be considered to be confirmed as abandoned.

总之，未予回应的情况可作为证据提交法庭，证明对数字钱包所有权利、所有权及权益的放弃。

In sum, the lack of a response may be provided to a court as evidence the relinquishment of all rights, title, and interest in the digital wallets.

此为重要法律通知，若该数字钱包的真实拥有者未作回应，其权利可能受到不利影响。

This is an important legal notice, and rights could be adversely impacted if the bona fide owner of this digital wallet does not respond.

提供所有权证明的方式有两种：一是在任何链上交易中使用与该钱包关联的私钥，此举既能让拥有者匿名表明所有权，又几乎无需成本；二是通过下方联系表单向所罗门兄弟公司发送消息，详细说明您对所有权的主张，并附上证明文件。

Pro provide proof of ownership either by using the private key associated with the wallet on any on chain in any on chain transaction, which allows the owner to signal ownership while maintaining anonymity and costs an owner nearly nothing, or two, sending Solomon Brothers a message using the contact form see below with a detailed description of your valid claim to ownership, including supporting documentation.

消息可由拥有者或其代表发送以保持匿名。

Message can be sent by owner or by owner's representative to maintain anonymity.

通过下方联系表单发送消息。

Send a message via the contact form below.

客户主张所有权。

Client seeks ownership.

对吧？

Right?

吧啦吧啦吧啦吧啦。

Blah blah blah blah blah.

此后，不得。

Henceforth, no shall.

擅入吧啦吧啦吧啦。

Trespass upon blah blah blah blah.

好的。

Okay.

所以基本上这就是要点。

So that's basically the the gist of it.

在我看来，这一切似乎都像是一种方式，我会变得极度防备。

And this all seems to be a way to like, in in my mind, this would be a way to like, I would be super defensive.

我即将获得90亿美元。

I am I'm about to come into $9,000,000,000.

政府讨厌人们发现钱财。

Governments hate people finding money.

而且，从法律角度，我会拼命想在这件事上保护自己。

And also, the the legal like, I would desperately want to protect myself legally around this.

再次强调，这也是为什么我不完全确定关于漏洞利用的说法。

And, again, this is part of why I just don't under I don't I'm not a 100% sure about the exploit narrative.

至少目前还没有非常有力的证据。

There's at least not very strong evidence of it yet.

如果是漏洞利用，那很可能是一个钱包或一个工具，只有几个不同的地址。

And if it was an exploit, the fact that it would be, like, one wallet or maybe one tool with just a few different addresses.

你知道，最终这只有8个UTXO。

You know, this was at the in the end just eight UTXOs.

所以不像是有数百个不同地址被入侵，涉及大量不同金额。

So it's not like, you know, hundreds of different addresses are being compromised with tons of different amounts.

如果这个工具被入侵，可能是一个非常特定的工具，或者某人编写的脚本——某个超级赛博朋克极客为自己写的，但在熵值上犯了错误，也许有人就是在拼命挖掘旧地址和交易，试图从某些错误假设中生成私钥。

If this tool was compromised, it might have been a very specific tool or a very like, a a script that somebody wrote, you know, some super cyberpunk nerd wrote for themselves and made an error, made a mistake in the entropy, and maybe somebody was just literally mining old addresses and transactions as hard as they could trying to figure out how to generate private keys from whatever, I don't know, an assumption of some error.

又或者过去在随机数生成器中存在某种漏洞。

Or maybe there was some past exploit in, in random number generators.

有人可能一直在利用这个漏洞，将其与区块链上的地址进行比对，希望能偶然发现什么——这可能意味着所有这些地址都有关联，也许它们属于同一个钱包，或者实际上是使用相同工具（比如某个网站或GitHub上发布的工具）生成的独立地址。

And somebody was has just been using that and comparing it to addresses in the blockchain hoping that they stumbled upon something, which can mean that all of these addresses are associated and, you know, maybe they were part of the same wallet, or they could actually be separate ones with this same tool used on some website or, you know, released on GitHub or something somewhere.

谁知道呢？

Like, who knows?

但我更倾向于认为这不是什么非常严重的问题——虽然有猜测认为比特币早期存在非常严重的核心系统风险或漏洞。

But I'm less inclined to think this is some very serious there's number of speculation that there's some very, very serious core system of Bitcoin from the early days risk or exploit.

如果我们真遇到这种情况，那我预计他们会同时处理这全部八个案例。

And if we did see that, then I would expect you know, they they did all eight of these at the exact same time.

那他们之后会不会再处理另一批？

So do they do another batch later?

如果他们是通过漏洞慢慢获取地址的，为什么要等到集齐八个才行动？

Like, why did they wait until they had all eight if this is an exploit where theirs are slowly getting addresses?

他们是否检查过比特币历史前三年里的每个地址却一无所获？

Did they check every address in the first three years of Bitcoin's history and they couldn't find it find it?

但如果他们只是利用某个允许从熵值不足的随机数生成私钥的漏洞...那他们花了多久才确认找到了全部八个？我们会不会两周后又看到类似事件？

But if they're just if they're using a an exploit that allows them to generate private keys from not sufficiently random not sufficient entropy, basically, you know, how long has it been that they hasn't haven't found one that they think they found, you know, all eight of them, or are we gonna see this again, you know, in two weeks?

还会出现更多吗？

Are we gonna see another?

这可能是问题的关键——围绕这个特定风险：会不会又出现一个存有1000或23000比特币的地址？

That might be the real question here if around that that particular risk is does another address with a thousand Bitcoin or 23,000 Bitcoin?

一两周后会不会又有一个同年代的地址以完全相同通知和法律框架的形式被转移？这可能意味着漏洞会持续被利用。

Is another address from that era move in a week or two with the exact same notices and legal framework around it that should suggest that this could just keep going as this exploit is continually exploited.

不过，真正疯狂的是人数之多。

Something that's really crazy, though, is the number of people.

就像这件事发生后，我一直在翻查交易记录。

Like, after this happened, like, I was digging through the transactions.

比如这个，有些铭文上写着，就像有个家伙说的，恭喜啊兄弟。

Like, going to this, there's inscriptions where, like, one dude's like, congrats, man.

这是个重大发现，你们看这些东西。

This is a huge find and, you all this stuff.

顺便说一句，既然我给你传递了好运，也许你可以给我转一点点。

By the way, you know, just maybe send me a little bit since I sent good vibes your way.

还有一条附带奇怪回报的留言说：这对你只是九牛一毛。

And there's another one with an off return that says, it would be a tiny amount for me.

对你来说微不足道，对我却是救命钱。

It would be it's be a tiny amount for you, a life saving amount for me.

还有一大堆人只给他们转690聪之类的零钱，就为了把信息塞进链里。

And a whole bunch of people just sending them that 690 sats and stuff like like kinda dust threshold sort of stuff just to stick messages in the chain.

字面意义上，每条留言都是人们在乞讨硬币，简直就是在街头要饭。

Like, literal, every single one of them, people just begging for for coins from this, which is just, like it's literally panhandling.

要饭。

Panhandling.

比如有个家伙说：求求你转我1个比特币就好。

Like, one one dude was like, please just send me one bit Bitcoin.

这就是我全部所求。

That's all I need.

然后又有个人发了同样的内容，因为我在试图搞清楚，你知道，有时候看这个会有点混乱，哪些是发出去的，哪些是接收的，你知道，谁有私钥？

And then there was another one who just sent the the same because I was trying to figure out, like, you know, sometimes kinda confusing when you're looking at this, which ones are sent out and which ones are sent in for, you know, who has the private keys?

当你查看地址时，如果很久没操作可能会感到困惑。

When you're looking at addresses, it can be confusing if you hadn't done it in a while.

其中有一个，像是有人在铭文上写了同样的数字，又用了868之类的数字。

And one of them, like, somebody put on an inscription, did those same numbers again for 868, whatever they were.

所以这挺有趣的，我想，也很荒谬，已经有这么多小额交易涌入这些余额，在他们转移后，就有人开始说‘请给我一些’。

So it's just funny, I guess, and just ridiculous the number of, like, tiny transactions that have already flooded into these balances after they moved of, please give me some.

求你了，我想要一些。

Please, I want some.

但查看交易时，我发现了个有趣的点，没人提到过，可能和地址有关。

But looking at the transactions, there's actually something interesting that I thought, that nobody pointed out, which actually, maybe that had to do with the address.

如果你看这些现在有余额的不同地址，它们都是P2WPKH类型，这就像是新的过渡标准。

So if you look at these different addresses that actually have the balances now, they're all P 2 W P K H, which this is just like the the new segue.

这是BC1开头的地址。

It's the B C 1 address.

就是你现在常见的那种。

It's the one that you see commonly now.

又一个BC1，BC1。

Another B C 1, B C 1.

我们来找找这个词。

Let's look for the for the word.

努力。

Effort.

好的。

Okay.

开始了。

Here we go.

这个转给那个人，w p k h。

This one goes to this guy, w p k h.

10,000。

10,000.

10,000。

10,000.

有趣的是，现在其中一个地址持有超过10,000枚比特币。

So here interesting is this is holding over 10,000 Bitcoin now out of one of them.

但这个地址的特别之处在于它以1开头。

But the odd thing about this one is that this is a one.

这个地址以1开头。

This one starts with a one.

这是p2pkh地址。

This is the p 2 p k h.

这与所有支付出去的地址格式相同，表明这笔资金被发送到了不同的钱包。

This is the same address format that all of them were paid out to, which suggests this was sent to a different wallet.

因为你知道，当你选择钱包或创建派生路径时，你需要决定交易类型。

Because, you know, when you when you pick a wallet or you you create, like, your derivation path, you you decide your transaction type.

所以我觉得有趣的是，看起来他们可能把一部分转到了同一个钱包，也可能全部转到了完全不同的钱包。

So I just found that kind of interesting is that it kinda looks like they sent a bunch of them to the same wallet, or maybe they sent them all to completely different wallets.

也许每一个都有不同的助记词和私钥，每个价值十亿美元。

Maybe every single one of these has a different seed phrase and different private keys, a billion dollars apiece.

这么做可能是有道理的。

It probably makes sense to do that.

但我只是觉得他们选择完全不同的东西很有趣。

But I just thought it was interesting that they chose something completely different.

他们采用了旧标准。

They they went with an old standard.

实际上，他们采用的是p2pkh标准——这些资金正是从该类型的地址中被转出的。

In fact, they went with the standard that the p two p k h standard that was the address type that these were being spent from.

另一种迹象表明...我的意思是，显然不是p2pkh地址在这里被利用，这再次与那种说法不太吻合。

Another kind of indication that I mean, it's certainly not p two p k h addresses that are being exploited here, which, again, doesn't quite really fit that.

至少在我看来，这里的结构似乎不符合那种说法。

The the structure here doesn't seem to fit that narrative to me anyway.

更像是有人创建的某种特定工具或低熵值问题，最终被利用了。

More that it would be some explicit tool or bad entropy that somebody created and somehow this was, you know, finally exploited.

现在我不太确定的是，有个地址里包含了脏话f开头的单词。

Now one I'm not so sure about is the the fact there was one address that has the word the f word in it.

地址里随机出现了f-u-c-k这几个字母。

So it's f u c k randomly in the address.

有篇文章提出，这显示了他们工作量巨大，生成了难以置信数量的地址来达成目的，刻意展示某种密码学谜题。

Now, one of the articles I was suggest or reading was suggesting that this shows how hard they worked and that they generated, you know, an unbelievable amount address addresses in order to create this and how explicit it was to show, like, you know, they're trying to show a cryptographic puzzle or something here.

再说一次，那些丢失的数字很有趣，但我还是不太能理解。

And, again, the lost numbers are interesting, and I can't quite I don't quite understand.

就连那些猜测的人，这也像是某种超级叙事和信息之类的。

And even the people who are speculating, this is some, like, super narrative and message and stuff.

我我还没听到任何迹象表明这些数字在此背景下的真正意义，除了，你知道，我们发现了什么可怕的事情之类的。

I I haven't heard any indication as to what really the significance of those numbers is in this context outside of, you know, we figured out something terrible or something.

但我不知道。

But I don't know.

这这确实是个奇怪的事情，我可能不会觉得其中一个地址与这些交易相关联时里面含有'f u c k'有什么特别，实际上我不会觉得这完全不合常理。

It it's it is an odd thing, and I probably wouldn't think anything of the fact that one of the addresses then associated with other transactions around this had f u c k in it, I actually would not find that totally out of the ordinary.

或者说我会认为这是个巧合，因为生成任何一个特定的四字母单词的概率，我想，已经有一段时间了。

Or it would be I would assume it was a coincidence because the likelihood of producing any particular four letter word, I think, was it's it's been a minute.

我我应该确认一下的。

I should I should have confirmed it.

但我认为概率大概是，比如，四十万分之一之类的。

But I think it's, like, one in, like, 400,000 or something like that.

而三或四个字母的单词出现在地址中并不完全罕见。

Whereas a three or four letter word isn't totally uncommon to show up in the address.

如果恰好是'f u c k'出现在这些与余额相关的地址中，那将是个疯狂的巧合。

It would be a crazy coincidence that specifically f u c k showed up in these addresses related to these balances.

所以这很可能是个个性化地址，做这件事的人显然知道他们在做什么。

So this very well could be a vanity address, and whoever is doing this clearly knows what they're doing.

他们只是定期往OpReturn里扔东西。

They're just having they're just throwing stuff into OpReturn regularly.

他们他们当时在测试，而且为整个过程在几小时内迅速展开做好了准备。

They they were testing, and they were prepared for this entire process to unfold very, very quickly in a matter of a couple of hours.

他们事先已经安排好这一切。

They had set all of this up beforehand.

他们咨询了法律实体以确保能得到保护。

They had consulted with a legal entity to make sure that they could have protection.

他们可能已经准备好律师随时待命，以防政府或某些自称所有者的人找上门来。

They are probably ready and waiting with lawyers if a government comes after them or if somebody, you know, some claimed owner comes after them or something.

所以他们看起来准备得非常非常充分。

So they seem very, very prepared.

使用虚荣地址这件事有点奇怪。

The that being a vanity address is a little odd.

但考虑到《迷失》剧中的数字本身就很怪异，我也说不清。

But considering there is already the oddity of the numbers from the show Lost, I don't know.

也许这两件事同时发生确实有点牵强。

Maybe that does seem a bit of a stretch that both of those kinds of things are coincidences.

而且我们把2025年10月5日设为最后期限，这个日期与剧集相关。

And we've got the 10/05/2025 as the deadline, which is related to the show.

整个情况中有很多古怪的地方。

Just a lot of really quirky things about the whole situation.

但除了那种认为这是严重漏洞、比特币或某些地址类型存在脆弱性的说法之外。

But outside of the suggestion or outside of the narrative that, you know, this is some very serious exploit and Bitcoin is vulnerable or certain address type is vulnerable.

我觉得这种可能性不大。

I don't I don't find that likely.

可能是某些旧软件或工具脚本的熵值极低，而且大概率没有大规模使用过。否则这些地址怎么会同时被创建，而我们却没发现大量其他类似案例？不过时间会证明一切，几天或几周后就能见分晓。

It could be some old software or some tool or script that had very poor entropy and likely something not used in mass or it seems odd that these addresses would all be done at exactly the same time and we wouldn't have a ton of others or, you know, I guess probably just time will tell when it comes to that is we'll see what happens in a few days, in a few weeks.

他们会用另一组地址再做一次吗？

Do they do this again with a different set of addresses?

而且，你知道，如果我们再次看到这种情况，从旧币的角度来看会令人担忧，好吧，是哪个工具被攻破了？

And, you know, then if if we see this again, that's that would be concerning from the context of old coins is, okay, what tool got compromised?

哪个钱包服务？

What wallet service?

是哪个钱包生成或密钥生成设备/软件被攻破了，因此有多少币实际上处于风险之中。

What what wallet generation or key generation device or software got compromised, and how many coins are literally at risk because of this.

在我看来，尤其是考虑到这些都有不同的私钥，最合理的解释是什么。

What what it feels like to me and what seems to make the most sense, especially considering these all have different private keys.

它们都是同一批次完成的，极有可能这些地址彼此之间存在关联。

They were all done in one batch, and it seems very possible and very likely that these could be associated with each other.

我倾向于认为这些都属于同一个钱包。

I'm inclined to think this is all one wallet.

这是某个人的钱包，有人发现了一台笔记本电脑或电脑之类的设备，上面有个钱包，里面存有这些币。

This is one person's wallet, and this was somebody had come across a laptop or a computer or whatever with a wallet on it that had these coins in that wallet.