本集简介
双语字幕
仅展示文本字幕,不包含中文音频;想边听边看,请使用 Bayt 播客 App。
怎么了,怪胎们?我是奥德尔。这次我又从卢加诺请来了一位现场代表,只有音频。这位是我们的好朋友,绝对的传奇人物,弗朗西斯。最近怎么样,弗朗西斯?
What is up, freaks? It's Odell here. I got another in person rep this time from Lugano, audio only. We got a good friend here, absolute legend, Francis. How's it going, Francis?
我很好,兄弟。谢谢邀请我。
I'm doing great, man. Thanks for having me.
这是我的荣幸。我们...你以前上过Dispatch节目吗?老兄,我上过...我上过
It's a pleasure. I've we haven't have you ever been on Dispatch? Dude, I've been I've been on
是和马蒂一起上的Dispatch节目,我想大概是...大概六年前吧,你说呢?
the Dispatch with Marty, I think, like, I don't know, like, six years ago, you said?
马蒂的节目对吧?我不...我不记得了。哦不。我们是2019年一起上的。
Marty's show. Right? I don't I don't remember. Oh, no. We did it together in 2019.
在比特币大会上。首届比特币大会。旧金山。对。天啊。好吧。
At the Bitcoin conference The first Bitcoin conference. San Francisco. Yeah. Oh my god. Okay.
从那以后我们可干了不少事。
So we've gotten a lot done since then.
哦,是的。
Oh, yeah.
那天是马蒂得知自己即将迎来第一个孩子的日子。我记得我们后来在屋顶上喝得烂醉。是啊。
That day was the day Marty found out he was having his first kid. I remember and then we got trashed on the roof. Yeah.
我觉得我们在撕裂前就已经喝高了。撕裂时也是。
I think we got trashed before the rip also. During rip too.
那天比特币涨到了1.3万美元顶峰。我还叫大家赶紧抄底。结果接下来两年都没突破1.3万,所有人都骂我是傻逼。
And Bitcoin topped at 13 k that day. Yeah. And I told everyone to smash buy. And for two years, we were under 13 k, and everyone said I was a fucking idiot.
是啊。那么现在谁是...
Yeah. Well, who's the who's
谁是傻逼呢?现在我们可是低调地翻了十倍。从那以后。好了,我有几个话题要聊。
the idiot now? Now we're just a humble 10 x Yeah. Since then. Okay. So I got a couple topics for us.
我们直接开始吧。第一个话题,你们发布了新的自托管Bull Bitcoin钱包。太他妈棒了。我一直在试用。
Let's just dive right in. First topic, you guys released the new self custody Bull Bitcoin wallet. Yep. Fucking awesome. I've been playing with it.
那么,对于还没使用过的朋友们,首先你可以在你喜欢的应用商店下载Bull Wallet,直接搜索Bull Wallet或者访问wallet.bitcoin wallet.bullbitcoin.com。但这个钱包到底是什么?为什么人们应该关注它?
So, I mean, to the freaks that haven't used it yet, first of all, you can just you can download it in your favorite app store at Bull Wallet. Just search Bull Wallet or you can go to wallet.bitcoin wallet.bullbitcoin.com. But what is the wallet? Why should people care?
是的。这个钱包是典型的经典比特币钱包,是它的核心。我们在底层使用了BDK,即比特币开发工具包。我参与比特币开发工具包项目已经快三年了。
Yeah. So the wallet is typical classic Bitcoin wallets is is the core of it. So we're using BDK under the hood, the Bitcoin dev kit. I've been involved with the Bitcoin dev kit project for like almost like three years. Yeah.
他们太棒了。
They're awesome.
他们确实非常棒。我认为Bold Wallet之所以特别、与众不同,或者说属于新一代比特币钱包浪潮的一部分——顺便说下,这是本次会议的热门话题之一——我们称之为下一代钱包,是因为最初我想开发一个LDK钱包。最初我的目标是打造一个像Phoenix那样的完全自主托管的手机端闪电网络节点钱包。这实际上就是我们的起点。
They're they're really awesome. What makes the Bold Wallet, I guess, special or different or part of like a new wave of Bitcoin Wallet, which is by the way, like one of the hot topics of this conference, it's like that we call them like the next generation wallets, is that actually originally I wanted to do an LDK wallet. Originally my goal was to have a full blown Phoenix style, fully self custodial, like lightning node on your phone wallet. So that's actually how we started. Right.
我们开始在LDK上构建。后来我对闪电网络有点幻灭,因为虽然闪电网络在很多方面做得非常出色——确实非常了不起——但有些问题你根本无法用闪电网络抽象掉。具体细节就不展开了,但主要与流动性管理有关,比如备份还好处理。
And I built we started to build on on LDK. And then I got kind of like I got a little bit black billed on Lightning because of that because, like, Lightning does a lot of things, like, really well. Like, Lightning is is really phenomenal, but there are things that you simply cannot abstract away with Lightning. And I don't have to go into the details, but it's got to do with the liquidity management, right? Like the backup stuff, that's fine.
在手机上运行节点没问题,是可以实现的。但流动性管理不仅仅是技术问题,还涉及经济因素。假设我是开发者,要推出一个钱包,当然需要找一个LSP。想象你有1000个用户,每人有1000美元价值的通道,那就需要LSP锁定100万美元的流动性——虽然可行。
Like running a node on your phone is fine. It's doable. It's just the liquidity management and also there's like, it's not just technical, there's economic components to it. Let's say, all right, I'm a developer, I want to launch a wallet, I need to find an LSP of course. And imagine you have 1,000 users with $1,000 worth of of channels, you have a million dollars of liquidity that needs to be locked up by an SP doable.
但当用户增长到10万甚至100万时,那锁定的资金量就太恐怖了。
But once you get to a 100,000 users or a million users, you're talking about a fuck ton of money.
总之是资本资本管理。
Anyway Capital capital management.
是啊。所以,你知道,我就觉得,好吧。看来LDK钱包是没戏了。所以
Yeah. So, you know, I'm like, alright. So the LDK wallet's not happening. So
如果真的是凤凰团队成为唯一一个差点就成功
what if Really Phoenix has been the only one who's too close to pulling
的。真他妈传奇啊。因为他们做的事真的真的非常难。而且说实话,我我我原本以为我们做不到凤凰团队那样的成就。他们真的特别厉害。
it off. Fucking legends, man. Because what they're doing is like really really really hard. And also, I I I honestly didn't think that we were gonna be able to do what Phoenix did. Like, they're they're exceptionally good.
他们的节点...我是说,他们的节点...我不知道现在上面有多少百万美元
And their I mean, their nodes I I don't know how many millions of dollars is on their node right
我很确定那是网络上最大的节点。我觉得Async可能是最大的节点。
I'm pretty sure it's the biggest node on the network. I think async is probably the biggest node.
但我觉得这是需要强调的重点,因为如果怪胎们都像我这样,我这辈子运行过无数闪电节点,7x24小时运行的闪电节点。现在我还运行着几个,主要是因为我需要7x24小时在线来完成某些任务,包括接收SATs。他们用SATs支持节目。但我日常使用的钱包一直是Phoenix。对吧?
But I just feel like that's an important thing to just iron in here because if the freaks are like me, I've run a ton of lightning nodes, twenty four seven lightning nodes in my life. I still run a couple mostly because I need like twenty four seven uptime or whatever for certain tasks including getting SATs. They support the show with SATs. But my go to wallet on a day to day basis has been Phoenix. Right?
我将单个币的联合UTXO合并成一个大UTXO。大UTXO用起来更顺手。把它放进Phoenix钱包后,我就能随时付款了。现在牛市障碍解除了,我坐在这里思考:接下来该用哪个呢?嗯。
I take a single coin joint UTXO, drop it a big a big UTXO. It works better with bigger UTXOs. Drop it into Phoenix, and then I just make my payments as I need to. And now that the bull wall is out, I find myself sitting there and like, one do I use going forward? Mhmm.
因为这里存在不同的权衡取舍,但它满足了我类似的需求。懂吗?比如我想给电子SIM卡充值,或者快速发送闪电支付时,我可以直接打开Bullwalt钱包操作。
Well, there because there's different it's a different trade off balance, but it it's filling a similar need for me. Right? Which is just I want to top up my eSIM or I want to send a quick lightning payment and I could easily just open Bullwalt and make payments.
Phoenix现在能用了。我选择Blackbaud的原因其实是2023年在萨尔瓦多会议期间——正好赶上第一波Ordinal手续费高峰。当时我在帮萨尔瓦多一个新人注册Phoenix,我说要给他转第一笔款,这时Phoenix启动了所谓的'即时通道'功能。
Phoenix works now. The reason why I got Blackbaud is actually because I was at the El Salvador conference in 2023 exactly during the first ordinal fee wave. And I'm onboarding a guy to Phoenix in El Salvador. I'm like, I'm going to send you your first payment. And then what Phoenix does is called the just in time channel.
如果对方正在收款,它会同时开通通道。所以我当时给那人转了5美元。
It will open a channel at the same time if the guy's receiving money. So I'm sending the guy $5.
但你可以链式交易啊。
But you could chain transaction.
是啊。但手续费要175美元,可能是SaaS服务商收的。开通道的手续费它...
Yes. But the fees were like 175, I don't know, SaaS provider or something. So the fee to open the channel It
大概4美元左右吧。
was like $4 or something.
不,要多得多。大概30美元左右,纯凤凰模型在费用低时经济性很好
No, way more. Way more. Like $30 or So something like that, like the the pure Phoenix model works well economically when the fees
费用低的时候。我想现在费用基本为零,大概还是60美分左右。是的。
are low. I guess even right now where fees are basically zero, it's still like 60¢ or something. Yeah.
所以我半夜躺在床上就在想,天啊,我们是不是得搞个托管钱包?我慌得要死,因为大家都知道我是自我托管的代言人,对吧?绝对不托管,永远自我托管,这是我的北极星。不惜一切代价自我托管。
So I'm like, you know, in my bed in the middle of the night and I'm just like, fucking, oh my god, like, are we gonna have to do a custodial wallet? I'm like freaking out because, you know, for for people who like don't know me, I'm like, you know, mister self custody, right? So like custodial No custodial ever. That's always been like my North Star. It's like self custody at all costs.
我做的一切都是为了支持或促进自我托管。我当时想,这他妈要怎么实现?于是就想到了用液态网络,对吧?而且我觉得很多人也差不多同时想到了这个点子——这个时间点正好是Ordinals垃圾信息泛滥的时候。这不是巧合,因为我们都在闪电网络全节点模型即时LDK上遇到了同样的问题。
Like everything I do is to support or facilitate self custody. I'm like, how the fuck we're going to do that? So that's when the idea of using the liquid network came in, right? And this and I think a lot of people have the same idea are pretty much around the same time and that same time is literally like the ordinals spam So it's not a coincidence because we all kind of like felt the same felt the same kind of like problem that I was having with with the just in time like LDK for like full Lightning node model. And yeah.
所以方案就是:好,我们做个内置比特币钱包和液态网络钱包的比特币钱包。问题是液态网络根本没人用,对吧?没有商家用液态网络。
So the idea was, alright. So let's build a Bitcoin wallet that has a Bitcoin wallet inside and a liquid network wallet inside. The thing with the liquid network is that there's no nobody else using it. Right? So there's no merchants using the liquid network.
他们都在用闪电网络。所以我们必须想办法在液态网络和用户的其他钱包间转移价值,这时Boltz公司出现了——比特币圈里我最爱的公司,这帮人简直是传奇,太牛逼了。
They're all using the Lightning network. So somehow, we needed to find a way to move value between the liquid network and whatever other wallet the person was using, and that's where this company came in called Boltz. So Boltz, my fucking favorite company in Bitcoin. They're absolute legends. They're absolutely amazing.
他们开发了一个API,能在不同网络和闪电网络之间创建非托管原子交换:比特币与闪电、液态与闪电、Rootstock与闪电,现在还有Arc与闪电。液态网络是最早的版本。
So what these guys did is they built an API that creates a non custodial atomic swap between various networks and Lightning. Between Bitcoin and Lightning, between Liquid and Lightning, between Rootstock and Lightning and now between Arc and Lightning. So so Liquid was the first iteration.
人们没有意识到Rootstock实际上在拉丁美洲的狂热玩家中相当流行。就像你去巴西时他们发现的那样。
And people don't realize Rootstock is actually decently used by degens in Latin America. Like they found that out when you went to Brazil.
Rootstock的交易量可能比Liquid本身还要大,我是这么认为的。
Rootstock has some probably I think like more volume than liquid itself actually.
就像在美国西部,我想到Rootstock。我都忘了那是六年前听说过的东西了。
It's like in the West in America, I thought rootstock. I forget that was like something that I heard of like six years
确实存在。对,没错。它是真实存在的。
It's it's a thing. It's yeah. Yeah. It's a thing. It's real.
所以是的,Bull Bitcoin是一个比特币钱包和Liquid钱包。当你发送和接收时,有一个非托管的原子闪电交换。这真的很像Moon,但是用Liquid实现的。完全就是那样。
So yeah. So bull Bitcoin, it's a Bitcoin wallet and a liquid wallet. And then when you send and receive, there's a non custodial atomic lightning swap. And that's really It's like moon, but with liquid. That's exactly that's exactly.
这就像Moon,但是用Liquid实现的,而且没有Moon发明的那个糟糕的备份系统,你懂的。
It's like it's like moon, but with liquid and without the retarded backups that, you know, system that moon invented. Right.
只是用种子备份。
Just uses a seed back.
是的,是的,是的。对我们来说,我们痴迷于钱包的标准化。所以我这次来的原因之一,就是要协助解决与ARC相关的问题,确保所有如雨后春笋般涌现的ARC钱包都遵循统一标准。
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And like for us, we are obsessed with standardization also in the wallet. So even here, one of the reasons I'm here is to help kinda like figure out stuff with ARC to make sure that all the ARC wallets that are popping up like really quickly are are on the same standards.
我们此行的另一个重要目的就是参与制定ARC标准。稍后我们会详细讨论ARC,没错。
We have we're we're here specifically to also partly build standards for ARC. Well, we'll talk about ARC in a second. Yeah.
让我们继续讨论这个钱包的话题。
Let's continue on this wallet.
没错,没错。我的目标呢,熟悉我的人都知道,我是个元老级人物。
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So and then my goal, you know, so like people know me. I'm an OG.
我是个密码朋克。我开发的产品——那些我想用的钱包,懂吗?在比特币这条路上走到现在,我做过很多事,如今想为自己做点什么。这个钱包项目完全出于自我驱动。
I'm like a cypherpunk. So the the the wallets that I I I build the product that I wanna use. Right? So I'm I'm at this point in my Bitcoin journey where I've done a lot of stuff, and now I wanna do something for me. Like, the wallet is a very ego it's a it's a fully ego driven project.
明白吗?首先我想打造自己真正想用的东西。某种程度上我甚至把它视为行为艺术,或者说——我希望它成为人们记忆中的标志性作品,成为我的遗产,毕竟Bull Bitcoin交易所终有关停的一天。
Right? So first of all, I wanna build something for me that I really wanna use personally. I also kind of consider it to be almost like a performance art or something like that or like I I want that to be like what people remember before. Like a legacy thing. I want that to be my legacy because the bull Bitcoin exchange will close one day.
懂吧?它本质上是法币业务。说真的,交易所他妈的就是最典型的法币生意。
Know? It's it's a fiat business. It's literally an exchange is a fucking it's the most fiat business ever.
我们只专注于比特币化,不涉及法币业务。
All we do is deal with Bitcoinization, we're not touching fiat.
当然。我希望这个开源比特币钱包能比我更长久,至少代码会永远存在,一千年后的人们或许会知道——我可能会把源代码刻在我的墓碑上之类的,这将是我的遗产。所以我希望它既非常易用又超级赛博朋克。这个钱包的设计理念就是要让它既性感又用户体验友好,同时内置赛博朋克功能,对吧?
Yeah, of course. And an open source Bitcoin wallet will hopefully outlast me and at the very least, the code will always exist and people in a thousand years probably gonna, know, I'm gonna probably inscribe a copy of the source code on my tomb or something, know, it's gonna be my legacy. So I wanted it to be kind of like very easy to use but also super cyberpunk. So some of so like the concept of the wallet is to is to make it sexy and and UX friendly, but also have cyberpunk features inside it. Right?
以这个钱包为例,我的目标是让它成为移动端的Sparrow替代品。想象一下Sparrow是桌面钱包的黄金标准,因为它赋予你完全控制权。
So from you know, my goal with the wallet, for example, is to is for it to be a Sparrow substitute for mobile. So imagine Sparrow is the gold standard of the desktop wallet because it gives you control.
是的,我们
Yeah, we
热爱Sparrow。它之所以出色是因为你能掌控一切:优秀的币种选择与标记功能,当然还能连接私有节点,以及硬件钱包。
love Sparrow. Sparrow is amazing because you can control everything. You have very good coin selection and labeling. Of course, you can connect your own nodes. And of course, with Spero, can connect your hardware wallet.
它具备精准选择、硬件钱包支持、私有节点连接等功能。内置隐私保护工具和Whirlpool混币服务,支持描述符操作,还能更新端口卡。简直就是个庞大的个人软件工具箱。
So it's got the point selection, it's got the hardware wallet, it's got your own node. They have privacy features, they have Whirlpool in there. You can do operations with descriptors. You can update your port card. So it's like a massive It's a software individual toolbox.
这就是
That's what's
这是一款支撑我所有项目、公司和家人所依赖的基础软件
sparing It's a piece of software that is my All my projects and companies and my family relies
的基础。
on.
完全正确。这是桌面软件的基础组件,堪称最佳,无可替代。
Absolutely. Foundational piece of desktop software. That's like the best, doesn't even come back.
不不不,确实如此。虽然也有Electron这样的选择,但我个人只用Sparrow。顺便说,我还给我妈妈展示了Sparrow,她觉得这个软件非常直观好用。
No, no, no. Exactly. And like you have like Electron, which is kind of there too, but I personally use Sparrow just because it's I showed Sparrow to my mom, by the way, and she she finds she finds it very intuitive.
嗯,这正是它酷的地方。对于高级用户来说,它几乎包含了你所需的一切功能。而对于普通用户,他们也能轻松上手使用。
Well, that's what's cool about it. It's like for a power user, it has literally everything you ever need. Yeah. But for the average person, they can figure it out and use it.
这正是我想在移动端实现的目标,也是BulleBitcoin钱包的宗旨。我们的一些创新让我们脱颖而出,比如我们是首个集成PageOn v2的钱包。我们就像是PageRelink的鲁莽版本,但未来会变得更好。
And that's what I wanna do for that's what I wanna do for mobile. And that's the goal of the BulleBitcoin wallet. And, you know, so some of the things that kind of made us stand out, like, we were the first wallets to integrate PageOn v two. We were kind of like the reckless version of PageRelink. It's gonna get way better.
就像PageRelink的最新稳定版即将发布。说实话,在移动端那样做确实很鲁莽,但它确实奏效了。PageRelink确实运行良好,我们已经拥有了...
Like, PageRelink, the the new version of the last, like, stable version of PageRelink, like, is is coming out. It it was pretty reckless to do that on mobile, to be honest. But it worked. Like, PageRelink actually did work. We have like
PageRune这块还有点粗糙,对吧?
The PageRune piece is still a little bit rough around the edges. Right?
是的。
It is.
我制作时遇到了困难
I have trouble making
确实。是的。
It is. Yeah.
即使在测试环境里也一样。
Even in like test environments.
而且它还不兼容,PageRune协议存在破坏性变更。但我们上周才刚发布1.0.0版本,所以PageRune从现在起基本上会趋于稳定和标准化。比如其他公司,像Cake(另一个支持PayJoin的钱包)和Bowl...对吧?
And it's also incompatible with like there's like breaking changes to the PageRune protocol, but we've literally just they launched the version one point zero point zero of page on like last week. So page on is is is basically going to become stable and standardized starting basically now. So for example, the other companies that like cake for example and bowl, Cake is the other wallet that which is PayJoin. Yeah. Right?
我们之前用的PayJoin版本不兼容,所以你其实可以...
We were like on incompatible versions of PayJoin, so you you can actually Oh,
是那个
is that
PayJoin在运作吗?对。对。对。好的。
what PayJoin is working? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Okay.
因为PayJoin一直在做这些改动,就像
Because PayJoin kept making these changes as
钱包会检测到这是一个兼容PayJoin的钱包。对。它不会完成交易。对。对。
The wallet would detect that it was a PayJoin compatible wallet. Yeah. It wouldn't make the transaction. Yeah. Yeah.
好的。而且PayJoin还有一个服务器组件。
Okay. And and paid join also has like a server component to it.
Wasabi也一样。Wasabi是另一个支持它的钱包,我想。
Same with Wasabi. Was Wasabi is the other one that supports it, I think.
对吧?对。但Wasabi,我可能会让它和Wasabi一起工作。
Right? Yeah. But Wasabi I'll probably get it to work with Wasabi.
版本不兼容。是的。抱歉。
Incompatible versions. Yeah. Sorry.
所以这确实有点鲁莽。不过没关系,反正没有资金损失。是的,交易无法完成。
So it was it was it was a little it was a little reckless. But yeah, so It doesn't matter. It's not like any funds are lost. Yes. The transaction doesn't work.
对,对。当然,我也想要一个隐私优先的钱包。人们想到隐私钱包时,总会问'那你们没有CoinJoin功能吗?'其实不是这样的。
Right. Right. And like, of course, I also wanted to have a privacy first wallet. And it's like people when people think about privacy walls, think like, Oh, so you don't have CoinJoin? No.
不,还有其他方面。比如没有推送通知,完全零数据收集。这些都是...
No. There's like there's other aspects to it. So, no push notifications, zero data collection whatsoever. There's all sorts of That's
这正是Phoenix的短板。他们做了很多...我们iOS和安卓开发时不做推送通知和云备份这些。
where Phoenix really falls by. They do a lot of the Yeah. We We don't age dev, iOS, Android checks where they're doing like push notifications, cloud backups.
是的。Boldit Point的开发团队,特别是钱包组的成员非常严格。对依赖服务器之类的要求极其苛刻。所以现在我们用的这个版本...其实我已经用了两年半,现在是6.2版,但直到最近我才放心推广它。
Yeah. No. And and the the Boldit Point dev team, specifically the ones that work on the wallet are are very strict. Very very very severe in terms of dependency servers and stuff So like of course, well now what we have, okay, what we have So I've actually been using it for two and a half years. We're on version 6.2 now, but we we came to a point where I was like comfortable promoting it.
对吧?实际上我们这两年已经积累了1万用户,完全没刻意推广。因为你知道,之前还有些bug。当然没有会导致资金损失的重大bug,但有些糟糕的用户体验问题。
Right? Mean, we we actually got like 10,000 users just through over the last two years. Literally not like literally not trying to to to push it because it was, you know, there's bugs. Right? There's there's like no there's no, like, catastrophic lose your money bugs, but, you know, there's like shitty shitty UX bugs.
对吧?但现在我们到了一个阶段,觉得可以开始商业化了。所以我们最近宣布了iOS版本上线。iOS真的非常难搞,精神上都是折磨。我们花了很长时间,非常非常长的时间才让苹果审核通过。
Right? But now we reached a point where we're like, okay, we're ready to to start to start like commercializing it. So, yeah, what we recently announced was the the iOS launch. IOS was actually very hard, like very hard, spiritually even. It took us a long time, a long, long time to get iOS, Apple to approve it.
来回发了大概250封邮件
Have, like, two fifty emails back and
这简直是创伤性经历。
That's a traumatic experience.
是啊,我差点就放弃了。真的,差点就放弃了。
Yeah. I almost gave up. Yeah. I almost gave up. Yeah.
嗯,还有什么好说的呢?
Yeah. So what else is there to say?
但我觉得,跟苹果App Store打交道确实很烦人。可如果你想做一个真正大规模使用的钱包,就得在用户所在的地方提供服务。必须同时支持两个平台。从推荐角度来说,你干这行和我一样久了。
But I mean, I think, look, it's pain in the ass working with Apple on the App Store. But if you want like an actual mass massively used wallet. You gotta meet people where they are. And it needs to be on both because Yeah. From like a from a recommendation point of view, I mean, you've been doing this as long as me.
是啊,一旦要问对方用安卓还是iPhone,然后推荐不同的钱包,整个流程就崩了。能直接说‘下载Primal’就好多了。
Yeah. Soon as I have to ask, like, oh, we're using Android or iPhone and then recommend a different wallet for them, it breaks apart. Yeah. Being able to say, like, download Primal.
当然。
For sure.
位置根本不重要,下载Bull Wallet就行。嗯,这是绝对关键的。好的。我想快速谈的是,你正在使用Liquid。它就像月亮。
It just doesn't matter where it is or download Bull Wallet Mhmm. Is is absolutely key. Okay. So what I wanna talk about real quick is so you're using liquid. It's like moon.
怪人们都知道月亮,因为我疯狂地向他们展示。我休息的地方,但与月亮不同,它位于Liquid网络上。然后你在进行按需交换。首先说一句,我真的很喜欢有个钱包。
The freaks know moon because I was showing them like crazy. Where I rest and but instead of with moon, I rest it sits on the liquid network. And then you're doing on demand swaps. First, a comment. I really like having a wallet.
你说你有链上钱包,很安全,你称之为安全比特币,然后是即时支付,我觉得这非常直观。就像,好吧,我不会把毕生积蓄放在即时支付里。我会放在安全钱包里。所以,我真的很喜欢这种框架。我觉得不需要向用户解释。
You say you have the on chain wallet, which is secure, you call secure Bitcoin, and then instant payments, which I think is just immediately intuitive. It's like, okay, I'm not keeping my life savings in instant payments. I'm keeping that in the secure wallet. And so, really like that framing. I think that you don't have to explain to the user.
过去很多人把它比作活期账户和储蓄账户。但我们要面对的是,大多数人根本不知道活期和储蓄账户是什么,对吧?所以我觉得这个框架非常好。干得漂亮。Liquid这个东西,大概十年来,已经经历了四五次炒作周期,现在才是Liquid真正要被使用的时刻。
A lot of people in the past have called it like checking versus savings accounts. But where we're going, most people don't know what checking and savings accounts are, right? So, I think that's a really good framing. Good job on that. Liquid is something that for probably like ten years now, fallen into the hype cycle of liquid maybe four or five times, really, this is the moment that liquid is actually going to be used.
我感觉这次可能是真的。但我以前也经历过。人们对Liquid的最大问题,我们之前讨论过,我想明确一下,就是它的协作诅咒模型。这是一个多重签名联盟,你不能随时离开。需要许可才能退出。
I feel like this might be it. But I've been there before. The big issue that people have with Liquid, we've talked about this in the past, and I just want to be clear with it, is it is a collaborative cussing model. So it's a multi sig federation, you can't leave on demand. You need permission to leave.
如果Bolt宕机了,你就无法从Liquid脱身。你刚才说要减少依赖,你怎么看待这个问题?这会让你夜不能寐吗?如果你有一批用户困在Liquid里出不来,你有什么缓解措施?
If the Bolt is down, you can't get out of liquid. How you think about that as you said, you want to reduce dependencies? Does that keep you up at night? Do you have a bunch of users that are in liquid, maybe they're not able to get out. How do you like What are the mitigations there?
这可能是我在全世界最喜欢讨论的话题。我要特别感谢Breeze的Roy,他在重新思考托管与去信任化方面非常有前瞻性。从技术上讲,Liquid是自我托管的,在技术层面上你拥有LBTC资产。
This is probably my favorite topic to discuss in the entire world. And I'm just gonna do a quick shout out to Roy from Breeze, which also is a very forward thinking person in terms of rethinking custody versus trustlessness. Right? So technically, Liquid is self custodial. Like on a technical level, you own the LBTC assets.
但当然,
But of course,
你并没有自我托管IO。
it's You're not self custodying the IO.
这不是完全去信任的。这有点像,如果你持有Tether,比如在...
It's not trustless. It's kind of like, if you have a Tether on your, I don't know, whatever fuck, like if you're in
对。
the Yeah.
如果你使用Trust钱包,你是在自我托管Tether。但最终是Tether这家机构在保证锚定汇率。这种保证是因为Tether会通过法币电汇来兑换你的USDT。某种程度上说,Tether是最后的赎回者。
And you trust wallet, you are self custodying Tether. But of course, Tether, the organization is the one at the end of the day, which is guaranteeing the peg. And the peg is guaranteed because Tether will send you a fiat wire transfer in exchange for your USDT. At some point, a there redeemer of last resort. I
我甚至认为像Tron这样的托管代币根本不可能真正去中心化。因为它本质上就是个中心化网络,最终大家还是在信任孙宇晨。
would go so far as to say it's impossible to sell the custody, Tron or something. Because it's just a centralized network. At the end of the day, there's trust in Justin Sun.
是的。而且它们绝对不是无需信任的。所以在我看来,Liquid就像是一种比特币稳定币。对吧,某种程度上来说。
Yeah. And they are certainly not trustless. So the way that I see liquid, I see it as a Bitcoin stablecoin. Right. Kind of.
对吧?所以它是一种稳定币。是另一种与比特币一比一挂钩的代币,而Liquid联盟的职责就是确保这种锚定关系。他们通过在多签钱包中托管与流通Liquid比特币等值的比特币来保证锚定。
Right? So so it's a stablecoin. It's another coin, which is backed one to one by Bitcoin and the job the job of the liquid federation is to guarantee the peg. Right. It's not and they guarantee the peg by custodying an amount of Bitcoin, which is equivalent to the amount of liquid Bitcoin, right, in a multisig.
因此从严格技术角度来说,他们并非托管你的比特币,而是确保你的Liquid比特币与比特币之间保持一比一的锚定关系。
So from a strict technical perspective, they're not custodying your Bitcoin. They're guaranteeing a one to one peg between your liquid Bitcoin and that is
还有运行时间。他们保证的是锚定机制的持续运行,对吧?
And uptime. They're guaranteeing pegging uptime. Right?
这里其实还存在法律层面的区别。我认为从法律上讲Liquid并非托管方,Liquid网络的设计与KYC监管及规避方式有关。Liquid实际上用非常巧妙的方式避开了KYC和反洗钱要求。
And there actually is a legal distinction also here. Yeah. Where I don't think legally that liquid is a custodian. I think legally, the liquid network for that has to do with KYC regulation and how to avoid that. So liquid actually like somehow has a very clever way to avoid being there's no KYC AML on Liquid.
就像,它是个区块链。引号引号。但我真正欣赏Liquid的地方在于它真实存在。
Like, it's a blockchain. Right? Quote unquote. But the thing that I really liked about Liquid is that it exists. Right.
而且它确实有效。对吧?批评某个事物很容易,说另一种模式可能更好,但那种模式并不存在,而现有模式是可行的。在我看来,这里存在一个程度问题。
And that it works. Right? So it's it's really easy to to criticize something and say that another model could be better, but the other model doesn't exist whereas the existing model works. And the way that I see it, there's so okay. So there is a scale here.
对吧?有两个轴。一个是y轴,一个是x轴。在我看来,存在一个用户体验与妥协的矩阵。对吧?
Right? There's two axis. There's the y axis and the x axis. And the way I see it, there's a UX and compromise matrix. Right?
所谓妥协,我指的是在核心密码朋克价值观上的让步——自我托管、隐私保护、去信任化和无需许可。对吧?通常公司的做法是:为了提升用户体验分,他们会在密码朋克精神上妥协。对吧?想想Coinbase、BitPay这些公司都是这样。
And by compromise, I mean compromising on core Cypherpunk values of self custody, of privacy, of trustlessness and permissionlessness. Right? So typically what a company will do is that they will compromise on the Cypherpunk ethos in order to gain UX points. Right? And it's almost like and think of like the Coinbase's and the BitPay's and all of these people.
它们会迅速妥协来换取微薄的使用体验提升。而我...我在矩阵上有几个锚定点,我想做的是:在某个妥协阈值之下,我绝不越界,但要在保持这个妥协水平的同时提升用户体验分。那些怪胎很难理解这点,毕竟我现在正用手比划着试图让你们想象这张图表。但Liquid对我来说比中本聪时代的安全系数高出几个数量级。
They very quickly compromise to gain marginal UX points. Whereas I I have and there's like these dots on on the matrix where I think what what what I wanna do is I have a certain level of compromise over which I will not walk the line and I need to stay under this compromise level, but I wanna increase my UX points under this compromise level. It's hard for the freaks to see that because I'm literally waiting with my hands right now. And I'm like trying to trying to make you imagine a chart. But but liquid is for me orders of magnitude more secure than like was it Satoshi.
没错。而且比Cashew安全几个数量级,比Fetty安全几个数量级。关键是它已经存在且运行良好。明白吗?
Right. And, you know, orders of magnitude more secure than cashew. Orders of magnitude more secure than Fetty. And now and it exists and it works. Okay?
可能不包括Fedi。
So Maybe not Fedi.
从技术上说...技术上联邦制大概...应该就是这么实现的。Fedi。
I mean, technically Technically, what the the Federate that's probably How it's implemented. Fedi.
对吧?关键在于具体实现方式会带来差异。技术上你完全可以搞出一个由15个专业团队运营的Fedi。
Right? So the thing is how it's implemented actually makes a difference. Right? So technically, you could have you could have like a Fedi that has 15 very professionally run.
对,只是还没有
Right. Just don't have
那个功能。我们目前还没有那个功能,对吧?就像液态网络是存在的。但我显然担心使用钱包时,人们会不小心把液态网络和比特币搞混。
that yet. We just don't have that yet. Right? So again, like liquid exists. But I obviously, my fear with using the wallets was that people were accidentally gonna confuse liquid with Bitcoin.
是啊。
Yeah.
这确实很难做到既不让用户认知过载,同时又不误导他们。这非常非常困难,需要在用户体验设计上非常精细。谢谢你这么说,我确实花了很多时间来解决这个问题。
It's it's really hard to to not cognitively overwhelm a person, but also not mislead them at the same time. It's very, very difficult. It requires a lot of finesse in UX. And thank you for saying, I actually spent a lot of time trying to figure that one out.
即时支付与安全的比特币之间的对比很好。
It's good instant payments versus secured Bitcoin.
就像一个共用余额,但又是我需要查看的两个独立余额。这很棘手。所以我做的一个功能是自动兑换。我认为自动兑换是Bull比特币钱包最他妈棒的功能。默认设置下,当液态网络达到100万聪时,下次打开钱包就会自动兑换成链上比特币,这样就有机制防止人们不小心...有意思。
And like a common balance, but also two separate balances that I have to look at. It's tough. So one of the things that I did is the auto swap. I think the auto swap is is the fucking greatest feature of the bull Bitcoin wallet. As soon as the auto swap is a million SaaS by default and then as soon as you reach a million SaaS on liquid, the next time you open the wallet, it will auto swap into the secret into Bitcoin on chain so that there's like a mechanism to prevent people from accidentally Interesting.
因为你其实不应该在液态钱包里放超过500美元,或者1000美元,也许几千美元?这取决于你的消费情况。
Because you're not you're not really supposed to have more than $500 in the liquid wallet or like a thousand or maybe like a couple thousand. If you're I don't know. It depends on what you're spending,
这要看情况。难点在于它占员工比例的问题。
you It depends. The hard part is it's like a percentage of your staff.
是啊,当然。当然。
Yeah. Of course. Of course.
所以这是要视具体情况而定的。
So it's on a case by case basis.
对吧?如果你是个有钱人,用比特币消费的话——我每月都要花几千美元的比特币。懂吗?
Right? And if you're like a rich guy and you're spending Bitcoin, I I spend thousands of dollars of Bitcoin a month. You know?
所以你账户里有1万流动资金也没什么大不了的。
So you have 10 k in the liquid wallet. No big deal.
没什么大不了的。这就像...你知道的,这只是我每月买菜交房租的预算。
No big deal. Like, it's not, you know, it's it's it's my monthly budget for like groceries and my rent.
但我喜欢那个自动兑换的概念。对对,这也是我在收银领域一直推动的方向。
But I like that auto swap concept. Yeah. Yeah. This is also what I've been pushing for in the cashier space. Yeah.
就像,你为了方便使用现金。但之后会自动将用户转移到更安全的设置中。
Is like, you use cash for convenience Yeah. But then move the user into a more secure setup automatically.
是的。所以我们需要为用户做出选择。这其实挺有意思的,默认选项很重要,因为Bull Bitcoin最初选择非托管模式的原因之一就是,那些托管型比特币交易所虽然声称鼓励用户提现到自托管钱包,但实际上他们根本不会这么做。
Yeah. So we need to make choices for the user. And know it's kind of interesting, but defaults matter and like these things matter because one of the reasons why one of the reasons why Bull Bitcoin is non custodial in the first place is because companies that are like custodial Bitcoin exchanges, they're gonna say, yeah, but we're encouraging people to withdraw to a self custody wallet, but they don't. They don't. They just don't.
用户资金就那样留在托管钱包里。所以我不希望Liquid也出现这种情况,尽管我觉得Liquid的安全性足以让我安心入睡。自动兑换功能让我感觉很放心,因为我知道用户最多可能损失百万级资产——虽然这不是小数目,但你也懂的,
They just leave it in the custodial wallet. So that's I didn't want that to happen with liquid even though I think liquid is secure enough for me to be able to sleep at night. The auto swap thing, it's like, okay, now I'm now I feel really comfortable because like, I know that the worst that can happen to a user is that they lose like a million sets, which is like not a trivial amount of money, but also like, you know,
这并非世界末日。
it's not the end of the world.
不是世界
It's not the end
末日。你总能想办法
of the world. You can claw your way out of
解决。是的。而且
that. Yeah. And
他们可能无论如何都不会。Liquid最大的优势之一就是长达十年、十二年的持续运行时间,
they probably won't anyway. Of the biggest things liquid has going for is just what, like ten years, twelve years of uptime,
它的组织也相对完善。Liquid并不是...而且一群人在自家地下室搞这个也没什么问题。这很酷很棒。但Liquid实际上有委员会、董事会,已经形成制度化体系。
It's relatively well organized also. Liquid is not And there's nothing wrong with a bunch of dudes doing that in their basement. There's nothing wrong with that. That's cool and that's great. But Liquid actually has We have committees, we have boards, we have institutionalized.
它已经制度化且有点官僚化,说实话有点烦人,因为确实存在官僚作风。而Blockstream作为公司并不控制Liquid,但可以说像是Liquid的秘书处。他们会发送会议日历邀请,确保各职能部门在需要更新软件时保持沟通。当然我对Liquid并不满意,就像我不希望比特币采用Liquid的模式。
It's institutionalized and it's a little bureaucratic, it's a little annoying actually because it's kind of bureaucratic and then you have Blockstream as a company which doesn't control liquid but Blockstream I would say is kind of like the secretary of liquid. So Blockstream, they will send you calendar invites to the meetings and stuff like that. They make sure the functionaries and everything are talking to each other when it's time to update the software and that kind of stuff. But I'm not satisfied with liquid, of course, like liquid, I don't want Bitcoin. I don't want liquid to be the model of Bitcoin, of course.
不过Liquid有个有趣的特点是我发现的:当你购买比特币时
So there is one thing interesting with liquid, which I kind of like discovered is that when you're buying Bitcoin
嗯。
Yeah.
无论金额大小,我认为都应该在Liquid上购买。Liquid有个很棒的功能叫机密交易。比特币没有这个功能是因为完全不具扩展性——每笔交易约6000字节。但Liquid的中心化优势恰恰带来了可扩展性和低费率,当然这也是比特币如此出色的原因。
You should always, regardless of the amount, I think you should buy them on liquid. Liquid has a very nice feature called confidential transactions. The reason that we don't have that on Bitcoin is that it doesn't scale at all. It's a very large transaction inside, it's like 6,000 bytes per transaction. But of course, the benefit of centralization with liquid is also that you get scale, you get low fees, which obviously that's the reason why Bitcoin is so amazing.
比特币的精华在于去中心化,这也限制了它的扩展性。如果通过增大区块来扩展比特币,就会导致中心化。而Liquid默认就是中心化的,所以可以实现扩展性功能。
It's that it's decentralized and that's why Bitcoin doesn't scale because if you scale Bitcoin by increasing the block sizes, you centralize Bitcoin. Liquid doesn't have that. Liquid is centralized by default. So you can do stuff on liquid that makes it scale.
很多人开始使用流动性和区块,我们会
A lot of people start using liquid and blocks start We'll
直接他妈地增加区块大小。你知道的,这没问题。这是15个功能员。嗯,很明显,
just fucking increase the block size. You know, it's fine. It's it's it's a 15 functionaries. Well, obviously,
我们会发送活动邀请,然后你们
we'll send an event invite and then you guys
我们就直接在软木塞上运行这个,或者随便什么方式。我们会执行硬分叉之类的。没关系。但它有保密交易功能。所以想象一下,当你购买比特币时想要防止的是最小化链上可追踪性,这不是什么‘去他妈的政府’那种事。
We'll just we'll just run this off cork or, you know, whatever. We'll run the hard fork or whatever. It's fine. But it has confidential transactions. So imagine what you want to prevent when you're buying Bitcoin is you want to minimize your on chain traceability and it's not like a fuck the state thing.
这也像是,不想被绑架之类的事,我不想让人知道我到底有多少钱。当我去商店买咖啡时——虽然闪电网络上不会发生这种事——但我不希望咖啡店老板知道我持有多少比特币。或者如果我买辆二手摩托车,我不想从我的储备中支付时让卖家看到我钱包里有10个比特币。
It's also like, don't want to get a kidnapped thing and I don't want people to know how much money I have thing. And I when I go to the store and I'm paying for coffee, which doesn't happen on lightning, but like I don't want the coffee shop owner to like know how much Bitcoin I have or if I buy like, I don't know, a used motorcycle at the store. I don't want to spend from my stash and the guy seeing that I have 10 Bitcoins in my wallet.
是的。我常举的例子是,你的老板不该知道你工资花在什么地方。当然。而卖你三明治的人也不该知道你的工资。没错。
Yeah. The example I always use is like, your boss shouldn't know what you're spending your salary on. Of course. And the guy you're buying a sandwich from shouldn't know your salary. Exactly.
这些都是基本的财务隐私原则。当然。所以
These are basic financial privacy primitives. Of course. So
如果你收到的是直接以Liquid支付,或者通过类似闪电网络到Liquid的快速兑换,最终资金会进入你的Liquid钱包。当你把这些资金兑换到安全的比特币链上钱包(比如Onchain钱包)时,最终比特币钱包中的资金与你最初收到的支付资金之间就不再存在链上关联痕迹。这有点像人们先兑换成门罗币再转回比特币的做法。明白吗?就像,哦,对。
if you receive if you get paid with either liquid directly or the bold swap like lightning to liquid, you end up with funds in your liquid wallet, whatever. When you swap that to your secure Bitcoin wallet, like the Onchain wallet, there is no more Onchain trail between the funds that end up in your Bitcoin wallet and the funds that you got paid from. So it's kind of like the way that people will swap to Monero or something. Right? Know, it's like, oh, yeah.
你可以先兑换成门罗币再转回比特币。这其实和你在Liquid上的操作类似——可以先兑换到Liquid再转回来。
Well, you swap to Monero and come back to Bitcoin. Well, that's kind of like what you can do with liquid. Can swap into liquid and swap back.
但两种情况都不完美,存在时间分析漏洞等问题对吧?就像他们能观测到。嗯。也许随着使用人数增加会有所改变。
But in both situations, you have a like, it's not perfect. There's a timing analysis issue and stuff, right? Like, they see it. Yeah. Maybe that changes as more people use it.
但目前用的人还比较少。
But right now, as as there's less people using it.
关键在于机密交易——你在Liquid链上看不到具体金额。虽然能看到Liquid和比特币链在某个比特币区块内发生了交易,但无法匹配具体金额因为...
Well, the thing with is with confidential transactions, you don't see the amounts on the liquid chain. So you can you can see that a transaction happens on liquid and Bitcoin within a Bitcoin block, kind of, but you can't match them because you can see the demand on
你是说随着Bolt交易量增大,效果会更好对吧?
That's what saying as Bolt's does more volume, it's probably better. Right?
对。对对。因为如果你...
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Because if you're
当然,唯一这么做的。十分钟左右的时间段,那么他们看到有资金流向批量钱包也没关系,因为地址是公开的,只有金额被隐藏。
the only one doing it in Of course. Ten minute period or something, then it doesn't matter if they see a liquid transaction going to the bulk wallet and then you see because the addresses aren't blinded, only the amounts.
金额和资产类型。对吧?所以如果有人...你无法分辨是USDT还是比特币,也无法判断是哪种资产,或者像是...
The amounts and the asset type. Right? So if someone's you can't tell if it's USDT or if it's Bitcoin and you can't tell what the Or if it's like
Samson的视频什么的。对。
Samson's video Whatever. Yeah.
Liquid上的某个垃圾币。所以Liquid并不完美。这个生态系统也不完美。当然存在一些故障点,比如Bolt是少数几家提供交换服务的公司之一...
One of the shitcoins on Liquid. So Liquid is not perfect. The ecosystem is not perfect. There's like Of course, there's like points of failure which is like, Bolt is one of the two or three swap companies that
Bolt是开源的。你不能自己运行这个作为服务提供商吗?
are doing Bolt's open source. Can't you run this as I well provider
当然也可以自己运行这个作为服务提供商。
can definitely run this as well provider.
那么你有考虑过这个吗?我之前问你时其实是在引导话题,我说如果你的用户遇到Bolt宕机,他们就会被困在Liquid里...
And so is that something you're considering? That's kind of I was I was a leading question when I said to you, like, your users would be like, if Bolt's goes down, then I'm stuck in liquid for
我非常有信心会有一群匿名用户在重复运行运行重复操作。
I'm I'm I'm confident there's gonna be a bunch of anonymous people running running Repeating.
对吧?是的。是的。那么你想象在钱包里,你会允许
Right? Yeah. Yeah. So do you imagine in the wallet, you'll allow
100%切换服务商?100%。我认为目前我们只用Bolt的原因。现在手机上就有一个Bolt服务器,就是Bolt的那个。其实有两个原因。
A 100 the switch provider? A 100%. I think that the reason why right now we are just using Bolt. So right now there's like one Bolt server by the phone, which is the Bolt one. There well, there's two reasons.
第一个是因为我喜欢这些家伙,他们从兑换中赚钱。对。是吧?而且,Bolt比特币不需要从兑换中赚钱。
The first one is because I love these guys and they're making money from the swaps. Yeah. Right? And like, Bolt Bitcoin doesn't need to make money from swaps.
他们已经做了大量工作证明。运营得很好。
And they've done a lot of proof of work. Good operations.
是的。我们从交易所赚钱。所以我不想从钱包里榨取收入。我在交易所赚的钱比从钱包里能赚的多得多得多。另一个原因是运营Bolt服务器并不简单。
Yeah. We make money from the exchange. So I'm not trying to milk revenue from the wallets. I make way, way, way more money on the exchange than anything I could do with the wallet. And the other reason is that it's not trivial to run a Bolt server.
光是运行一个闪电网络节点就是全职工作,他们做得很好。但未来肯定
It's just running a power lightning node is a full time job and they're doing a great job. But definitely in the future,
这本质上还是同样的LSP问题,对吧?这是个资本受限的问题,只是稍微简单一些。
And it's kind of the same LSP problem. Right? It's capital constrained problem. It's little bit easier.
是的。你需要流动性来运行一个Bold服务器,而且需要能够快速自动调配这些流动性。你需要脚本,需要工程师来管理这一切。所以这并不简单。
Yeah. Need you need you need you you you need liquidity to run like a bold server and you need to be able to move that liquidity automatically quickly. You need scripts. You need like engineers to like manage all that. So it's not trivial.
但也不是什么魔法。任何有足够动力且运行闪电网络节点的人都可以运行Bolt服务器。未来你肯定会看到各种不同的Bolt服务器,甚至可能出现Bolt服务器发现机制——就像Wazabi做的那种协调发现机制,顺便说,那其实是我在Nosser上悬赏的项目。
But it's also not like magic. It's not anybody that's motivated enough and that is running a power lightning nodes could run like a Bolt server. And in the future, of course, what you're gonna see is, you're gonna see a bunch of different Bolt servers and maybe even Bolt server discovery mechanism, kind of like, that's one of the things that Wazabi did that I thought was And coordinated discovery. And by the way, just so you know, that was a bounty on Nosser that I paid for. Yeah.
我悬赏的这个项目最终由Cook在Nasser上实现了,这是个协调器发现服务:当钱包启动时,如果有人通过Tor匿名运行协调器,问题在于如何在不暴露身份的情况下推广匿名服务?解决方案就是通过主网发布公告,客户端可以获取这些公告。
Was my bounty that actually Cook's ended up implementing in Nasser, is a coordinator discovery service where when you start up the wallets, if you have people that are running coordinators anonymously over Tor, the problem is like how do you market your anonymous service without doxing yourself? Well, you can just announce it on master and your clients can just get all these announcements.
就像这个协调器一样,你也面临着用户体验问题
And you have the UX problem just like this coordinator do I
在保持用户体验的同时做出妥协
compromise while maintaining the UX.
降低信任度,但在用户体验上尽可能推进。对,这正是我们这个领域一直面临的问题——总是非此即彼的极端情况。
Lower trust but pushing it as far as possible to the UX. Right. Yeah. Which is a problem we've had in this space. It's either one extreme or the other.
要么是用户体验极佳且高度可信,要么是极度自主的赛博朋克风格但用户体验糟糕。我们需要一些中间选项。
It's either super trusted with good UX or very sovereign cyberpunk and horrible UX. We need a bunch of options in the middle.
是的,是的。你必须做出某种程度的妥协,但我们的工作在于——其实有两类赛博朋克。懂吗?一类是理论派赛博朋克,另一类是商业化密码朋克。
Yes. Yes. There is there is some there is some degree of compromise that you have to make, but what our job as so there's there's two types of cyberpunks. Okay? There's the there's the intellectual cyberpunks and there's the like commercializing cipherpunks.
正因如此,比如我钟爱Breeze、Arcade和Boldz,因为我们他妈的真能交付产品——我们确实能交付。
And that's why, for example, I love Breeze, I love Arcade, I love Boldz, is because like we fucking we ship we fucking ship products.
我们交付
We ship
人们实际使用的产品,并且我们会持续迭代改进。想聊聊ARC吗?
products that people use and, you know, we change our products over time. We improve them over time. You wanna talk talk about ARC?
对,简单说下。我刚才提到什么来着?Bulk。对。
Yeah. So just real quick. What did I have there? Bulks. Yeah.
咱们重点说说ARC——既然在讨论流动性,我们正在使用liquid方案,同时有两个新项目已启动交付。我完全赞同你的产品观:去他妈的炒作。这个领域过去十年充斥了太多虚假炒作。要是我盯着每份白皮书,就根本没时间做实事了。
Let's let's talk about ARC because so so we're talking about liquid. We're using liquid here, and two things have come two new projects have started shipping. And I'm right there with you that I from a from a product focus point of view, like, fuck hype. There's so much bullshit hype in this space. For the last ten years, if I focused on every white paper that came out, I would have no time to actually get anything done.
所以,我通常只有在某样东西真正发布、真正可用时才会开始关注它,对吧?目前出现的两样东西是ARC和SPARK。昨天我们这里举办了ARC日。你对这两者有什么看法?
So, I really only start paying attention to something when it's actually shipping, when it's actually usable. Right? And so, the two things that have appeared is ARC and SPARK. Yesterday, we had ARC Day here. How are you thinking about those two things?
那么,你如何看待这两个项目与bull、liquid的关系以及未来的发展等等?
And then how do you how do you think about those two projects in relationship with bull and liquid and going forward and whatnot?
没错。ARC是比特币领域最让我兴奋的技术,可以说自闪电网络以来最让我激动的。当然还有其他让我兴奋的东西,比如静默支付和Nostradamus。我们在Bold Bitcoin上做的一些事情也让我非常兴奋。
Right. So ARC is the technology that gets me the most excited of of anything I've seen in Bitcoin since look. I'm gonna say probably since lightning. I mean, there's other stuff that gets me excited like silent payments and Nostrad, for example. Like, there's there's stuff that we've done in Bold Bitcoin like that that got me really excited.
有些事情...等等,在我深入讨论ARC之前——因为一旦开始讲ARC我就会深入探讨——比如静默支付,我认为这是一项非凡的技术。我们在Bold上将要实现的静默支付功能会非常牛逼。
Something that okay. Before I get into ARC actually because once I get into ARC, I'm I'm gonna go deep into ARC. Like Nice. There's stuff like silent payments, think is is a phenomenal piece of technology. I think what we're gonna do at Bold with silent payments is gonna be fucking dope.
Paynim和Samurai有什么问题?Paynim的问题在于他们有两个...那个比特...
What's the problem with Paynim with Samurai? The problem with Paynim is that they had a a there's there's two that bit
我正想说...
I was gonna say. The
靠,我忘记那个比特叫什么了。他们用的一个链上效率很低,还有Bit 47。然后当...
fuck. I forgot the name of the bit. One that they were using was like on chain inefficient and Bit Bit 47. And then When
有一笔交易是进出往返的。对。终于。没错。这个进出往返的交易建立了配对关系,所以你至少多了一笔交易。
there was a transaction in and off return. Yeah. Finally. Right. In and off return that set up the pairing between So the you had at least one extra transaction.
是的。
Yes.
而支付服务器是一个中心化服务器。
And the payment server was a centralized server.
命名方式,就像你拿到一个代码。对。对吧?你有一个一次性使用的代码,不需要服务器。是的。
The naming, so like you got a code. Yes. Right? You had a one time use code which didn't require a server. Yeah.
但如果你要向Sleepy Moose之类的付款,那实际上是一个连接代码的中心化服务器。我记得在我们继续之前快速说一下,批量交易方面,我认为用户需要明白最酷的部分在于你信任的是它们的正常运行时间。所以如果它们宕机,你就无法交易。但你实际上并不信任它们保管资金。如果交易失败,你不会损失任何钱。
But if you were going to pay to like Sleepy Moose or something, that was actually a centralized server that was connecting the code. I remember just before we move on real quick, on the bulk side, I think it's important for users to realize that the coolest part about bulks is you're trusting them with uptime. So, if they're down, then you can't make a transaction. But you're not actually trusting them with with funds. If if the transaction fails, you don't lose any money.
它们实际上从未托管资金。所以要求原子交换,这真的非常非常酷,与Shape Shift或Side Shift完全不同。哦。不同的即时
They never actually take custody of the funds. So demand atomic swap, which is really, really cool and very different from like shape shift or side shift. Oh. Different instant
100%同意。
A 100%.
过去见过。
Seen in the past.
两者都他妈的牛逼,因为你有一种叫做锁定交易的东西。对。基本上就像原子交换这种在比特币之前不存在的东西。对吧?这是一项非常新的金融技术,比如你向某人买毒品时,你交出大麻,我交出钱。
Both is fucking dope because you have you have what's called a lockup transaction. Yeah. Which basically like if the an atomic swap is is something that's like that does not exist before Bitcoin. Right? That is a very new financial technology which is, when you're buying drugs from someone, you hand over the weeds and I hand over you the cash.
我们无法原子化地用大麻交换现金。必须有人先付钱。而原子交换中,如果其中一笔支付失败,整个交易不会失败。两笔支付都必须成功。这简直太疯狂了。
Like we can't atomically swap the weed from the cash. Someone has to send the money first. Whereas an atomic swap, if one of the payments fails, the entire transaction doesn't fail. Like, both payments need to be successful. So so that's like that's crazy.
好的。那么静默支付,想象一下回归。对。想象如果我们有一个去中心化的静默支付目录。对吧。
Okay. So silent payments, imagine if for back. Yeah. Imagine if we had a decentralized directory for silent payments. Right.
其实我们已经有了,你知道的,就是LNURL。对。就是Noster。
Well, we have that with, you know, LNURL. Yeah. It's Noster.
对。
Right.
Nostr就是你的目录。没错。所以我并不是...我希望没人抢先做这件事,因为我会是第一个做的。但我已经把它放到GitHub上了,当然,我们要做的就是Nostr上的静默支付目录。
Nostr is your directory. Yep. So I'm not I'm not like, I hope nobody does that before me because I will only be the first one to do that. But I did put it up on GitHub, course, what you're do, what we're gonna do is silent payment directory on Nostr.
没错。Nostr启用的开放通讯录。
Right. Nostr enabled open contact book.
我想实现的是,我要为Blank打造像Cash App那样性感炸裂的用户体验,结合Cypher技术。Cash App性感体验的核心之一就是我能直接转账给Odell。对吧?我不是在给类似SP1212这样的地址转账。
What I wanna do is I wanna have the sexy fucking Cash App UX with Cypher for Blank. And part of the sexy fucking Cash App UX is that I send money to at Odell. Right. Right? I'm not sending money to like SP one two one two or whatever.
我认为具体来说,这可能是链上静默支付和闪电网络Bolt 12的结合。对。你甚至可以在里面放原生ARC地址。可以放
And I think specifically it's probably a combo of silent payments for OnChain Yeah. And then Bolt 12 for Lightning. Yeah. So And you can even put like a native arc you can put a native arc address in there. Can put
我不喜欢Nasser的一点是它太侧重闪电网络了,而人们还在用链上交易。我基本上想做链上应用。对吧?
The the one thing that I don't like about Nasser is that it's it's too lightning focused where people still use on chain. I wanna do basically, I wanna do on chains apps. Right?
Alex Gleason这个人,就是开发Social Provision现在搞AI和Oster的家伙,他发布了一个链上应用规范。不过这是个重复使用的地址。哦,这不是静默支付。是重复使用的地址。
So Alex Gleason, the guy who built Social Provision and now is working on like AI and Oster stuff, he released a spec for on change apps. Well, it's a But it's a reused address. Oh, well, It's not a silent payment. A reused address.
问题就在这儿。我们不是已经超越那个阶段了吗?静默支付实际执行起来很困难。
That's the thing. Like, don't don't we're we're past that. You know? We're we're past. The thing with silent payments is that it's actually hard to execute.
这个功能真的很难实现。对吧?所以至今没人做成。
It's really difficult to to implement. Right? That's why nobody has done it.
这就是为什么我有点喜欢重复使用的广告,因为它非常简单。而且,对于公共Zaps来说,反正也没什么隐私可言。所以这种隐私交换还不算最糟糕的。
That's why I kinda like it's reused ads because it's very simple. And also, like, for public Zaps, there are there's no privacy anyway. So it's like not that worst privacy trade off.
你可以,你可以
You can have you can
如果你使用Zap我的帖子,它会显示法国已经Zap了,你知道的,2000套
have If you use Zap my post, it like says France has Zapped, you know, 2,000 sets of
当然。但我们可以有不透露交易ID的Zaps。这显然更好,对吧?
Sure. But we can we can have Zaps that don't reveal the TX ID. Of course. Right? That's strictly better.
对对,这显然更好。所以这就是我想做的。我不想走回头路,你懂吗?我想努力推动它前进,但这很难。这就是为什么我要特别提一下CAKE。
Yeah, yeah, that's strictly better. So that's what I want to do. I don't want to go back, you know? So I want to try to push it forward, but it's hard. And that's why, for example, I got to give a shout out to CAKE.
CAKE山寨币钱包,里面有莱特币,有门罗币,还有各种乱七八糟的东西,但他们已经推出了产品。他们不仅推出了,还实现了静默支付和
CAKE Shitcoin wallet, it it has Litecoin, it has Monero, it has all sorts of crap in it, but they have shipped. They ship and they have shipped silent payments and
我经常邀请Seth上节目,为此没少挨骂。
I have Seth on the show all the time and I get so much shit for it.
他很棒。我超喜欢这些人。
He's great. I love these guys.
但我过去确实因为比特币的事没少骂他们。我觉得这是个干扰。他们有点陷在技术债务的泥潭里,就像...他们已经有大量用户了,所以很难让他们离开这个平台。
But I've I've historically given them a ton of shit for the Bitcoin stuff. I think it's a distraction. They are kind of stuck in the tech tech tech debt world where it's like Yeah. They already have nano users and shit. So it's hard to get them off the platform.
但在比特币方面,他们的开发速度简直疯狂。
But on the Bitcoin side, they ship like crazy.
是啊是啊。说到无声支付...另一件事是...我不想深入讨论这个,因为对很多人来说会很难接受。
Yeah. Yeah. So yeah. So silent payments. The other thing that I've and I don't wanna get too deep in that because that that's gonna be a hard pill for swallow for a lot of people.
我们确实开发了一个非常先进的比特币钱包备份协议,大致基于五年前提出的Photon SDK概念。来简单聊聊这个吧。
We did actually do a very advanced Bitcoin wallet backup protocol, which is loosely based on the Photon SDK concept, which came out about five years ago. Yeah. Let's talk about that real quick.
好的。因为我认为云备份实际上又一次打破了用户体验与自主权之间的平衡。
Okay. Because I think cloud backups are actually once again, you're pushing the UX sovereignty trade off balance.
你试过Bolt里的加密备份功能吗?
Did you try the encrypted backup in Bolt?
在iOS上不能用。哦,真的吗?
It doesn't work on iOS. Oh, it doesn't?
好吧。听着,你们这些家伙没听见吧。我们会解决这个问题的。
Alright. Okay. You didn't hear that, Freaks. We're gonna fix that.
好的。其实我一直想给你这个反馈。
Okay. So I've meaning to give you that feedback.
好吧。长话短说:我们要做一个既易用又安全,同时实现难度很高的东西。如果用用户生成的密码加密比特币钱包备份,你会得到备份的。
Alright. Okay. So here's the here's here's the TLDR. Wanna make something that's easy to use, that's secure, and that's very difficult. If you if you encrypt a Bitcoin wallet backup with a user generated password, you will get backed.
对吧?你以为自己密码很安全,觉得12个字符的BIG39助记词很可靠,其实不然。
Right? So you think you have a good password, you think your you think your BIG39 passphrase is good because it's fucking 12 characters, it's not.
这是可以暴力破解的。真的。比如苹果用户或任何能访问...
It's brute forceable. It really is. So some kind of like an Apple user or anyone who has access to
iCloud的人
iCloud, a
尝试一堆密码直到有一个能用,让电脑来完成这个过程。
bunch of passwords until one works, has a computer do it.
是的,有点像暴力破解。因为如果物理上获取了你的加密备份文件,加密过程是没有速率限制的。不像手机PIN码那样有尝试次数限制。
Yeah. Sort of brute force. Because if take the physical possession of your encrypted backup file, there's no rate limiting on the encryption. It's not like the pin on your phone where there's rate limiting.
这是安全元件在起作用。
It's a secure element stopping.
没错。如果我拿到了物理备份,我就能对它进行暴力破解,而且我一定会这么做。已经有研究显示人们成功暴力破解了BIIB 39,现在用计算能力生成足够尝试的密码量简直是轻而易举的事,对吧?
Yeah. Exactly. If I have the physical backup, I can brute force the shit out of it and I will. And there has been a research of people brute forcing BIIB 39 and you think the amount of generating compute enough to brute force a password is it's a trivial thing now. Right?
就像是
It's like
而且众所周知用户设置的密码都不够安全。
And users it's known that users don't make secure passwords.
他们确实完全不会设置安全密码。是的。所以我们采取的措施基本上就是
They they they they certainly absolutely do not. Yeah. So what we did is basically
另一方面,他们也可能把安全措施做得太过头,结果反而忘记了密码。没错,他们失去了访问权限。明白吗?因为你要记住,大多数人——我不是在提醒你。
And then you also have the opposite side where then they make it too secure and then they forget it. Good. They lose access to it. Right? Because you have to remember that most people I mean, I'm not reminding you.
我是在提醒那些怪咖。大多数人丢失比特币,不是因为被盗,而是自己弄丢的。所以你总是在试图找到那个平衡点。
I'm reminding the freaks. Most people lose Bitcoin. They don't get it stolen. So you're always trying to find those balance.
好吧,这些内容都可以在recoverable.com上找到。我专门做了视频解释所有这些。我花了很多时间,要知道我的背景来自比特币大使馆,在那里我接触过智商极高和极低的用户。
And, you know okay. So all of this is on recoverable.com. Okay? I literally have a video explaining all of these. I spent a lot of time and, you know, that's the background that I came from is from the Bitcoin Embassy where I dealt with both the really high IQ and the low IQ users.
所以我认为我很了解比特币玩家,非常了解比特币用户。当然,这就是个大问题——如果你的密码短语足够安全,你可能会忘记它;如果不够安全,又会被暴力破解。怎么解决?
So I think I know the Bitcoiner and I know, like, the Bitcoin person really well. And, of course, that's the big problem. If your passphrase is secure enough, you're gonna lose it. And if it's insecure, you're gonna get it brute force. How do fix that?
我们的解决方案并不是我发明的,但我觉得我们做得更好。本质上,我们通过BIP 85从比特币钱包私钥本身派生出一个很大的加密密钥。所以你先从助记词开始,然后我们派生
Well, what we did is I didn't invent that, but I think we did it way better. It's basically, we derive a very large encryption key from the Bitcoin wallet private key itself using BIP 85, right? So you start with the mnemonic and we derive
子密钥。
The child key.
本质上是从你的助记词生成另一个助记词,对吧?这只是随机熵值,我们用从助记词派生的密钥来加密这个助记词。
Essentially another mnemonic from your mnemonic, right? It's just random entropy and we encrypt the mnemonic with the key that we derived from the mnemonic.
对。
Right.
明白吗?所以你可以把加密的助记词上传到云端,因为暴力破解那个加密文件所需的能量和猜测你的信用密钥是一样的。
Okay? So you can upload your encrypted mnemonic to the cloud because that to to to brute force that encrypted file is the same energy required to guess your credit key.
对。所以
Right. So
但问题在于,好吧,现在你的加密密钥又是另一个助记词。这该怎么处理?
but of course, the problem is, alright, so now your encryption key is another mnemonic. What do do with that?
嘿。如果我手机丢了。对吧。我怎么恢复?
Hey. So I lost my phone. Right. How am I restoring?
好的。那个加密密钥能让你...首先,要恢复你的备份文件,你只需进入你的云端硬盘,比如Google Drive,下载它就行。这没问题。对吧?但怎么解密呢?
Okay. So that encryption key that allows you well, the fir first of all, it to restore your your your backup file, you just go in your drive, in your Google Drive, and like you download it. It's fine. Right? How do you decrypt it?
我们开发了一个叫密钥服务器的东西,也叫可恢复服务器。你可以把它想象成密码管理器。它是完全匿名的,不需要账户。
Well, we created something, it's called the key server. It's called the recoverable server. And think of that as being like a password manager. It's fully anonymous. There's no accounts.
没有邮箱,也没有电话号码。它只能在Tor网络上运行。当你进行备份时,需要将加密密钥交给密钥服务器,并用一个非常简单的密码进行身份验证。对吧?
There's no email. There's no phone number. It works only on Tor. And when you are doing a backup, you give the encryption key to the key server and you authenticate yourself with like a very easy password. Right?
所以用户仍需设置密码,但这个密码更简单,因为它不是
So the user is still picking a password, but it's an easier password because it's not
密码可以是一个六位数的PIN码。明白吗?因为可恢复服务器强制要求Zoom用于
The password can be a six digit PIN. Okay. Right? Because the recoverable server enforces Zoom for
访问用户数据库只需点击云备份,然后记住一个六位数PIN码。
access to user base is just pressing cloud backups and then just remembering a six digit PIN.
是的。
Yes.
如果他们丢了手机,在新手机上重新安装应用,输入六位数PIN码。没错,钱包就回来了。
They lose their phone, they reload the app on the new phone, they put in a six digit PIN Yeah. And the wallet's there.
至少需要六位数PIN码,而且我们会屏蔽最愚蠢的六位数组合,比如你不能
It's it's minimum six digit PIN and we we prevent the most retarded six digit like, you can't
一一一一。
One one one one.
你不能那样做。实际上,我们有最常见的1000个密码。你不能使用最常见的1000个密码。哇。除了12345611111888888之外的任何组合。
You can't do that. Like, we we we actually, we have the thousand most common pins Okay. And you can't use the thousand most common pins. Wow. Anything other than 12345611111888888.
比如,你可以那样做。密钥服务器和我们实现的方式——我不会深入细节,但我们实现的方式非常棒。它是完全匿名的。密钥服务器无法知道你是谁。除了TOR之外没有其他连接方式。
Like, you can do that. So the key server and like the way we've we've I'm not gonna go too deep into the details, but the way that we've implemented it is really good. It's fully anonymous. There's no way that the key server knows who you are. There's no option to connect to it other other than TOR.
如果TOR不工作,你就无法使用可恢复的密钥。
If TOR doesn't work, then you can't use the recoverable The if key here
我们实际上要讨论权衡模型,从技术上讲,你可以与苹果合作窃取备份,对吧?技术上来说,可恢复密钥与苹果和谷歌的可恢复功能并不互通,这比单纯信任苹果或谷歌要严格更好。
we're gonna actually talk about trade off model, you could technically work with Apple and steal the backup, right? Technically So, that recoverable and Apple recoverable and Google aren't working together, which is a strictly better than Yes. Just trusting Apple or just trusting Google.
如果我能以某种方式说服拉里·佩奇让我访问所有谷歌云端硬盘
If if I was somehow able to convince Larry Page to give me access to all the Google Drive
反之亦然。
Or vice versa.
或者说反过来。问题是谷歌并不知道是否使用了可恢复服务器或正在使用哪个可恢复服务器,因为你可以选择不使用可恢复服务器。你可以导出那个私钥,直接进行常规备份,无需依赖服务器。
Or or vice versa. The the thing is Google doesn't know which recoverable server is being used or if a recoverable server is being used because you can use you don't have to use the recoverable server. You can export that private key and just do a regular backup without using the server.
是的。我的意思是,明确地说,我认为这是个很好的权衡方案。它不是冷存储,但本就不该解决冷存储的问题。
Yeah. I mean, to be clear, I think is a great trade off. It's not cold storage, but it's not supposed to solve cold storage.
网站上的第一句话就写着:这不是冷存储。没错。
The first thing on the website is like, this is not cold storage. Yeah.
你们的框架设计得非常好。我想说的是,看看另一端的做法——不是对立面,而是另一个权衡方案,比如Phoenix的做法。在Phoenix上,他们有一个快速上传到iCloud的按钮。他们会让你勾选一个框,上面写着‘美国国家安全局和苹果公司可能会偷走你的钱’。
You do the framing really well. And I think, I mean, look at the opposite, not the opposite, but another trade off balance here is what Phoenix does. Where on Phoenix, they have, like, a quick and easy upload to iCloud button. Yeah. And what they say is, like, they make you check a box that's, like, the NSA and Apple can steal your money.
你能接受吗?而且,这种威胁模型对大多数人来说可能已经足够好了。我认为大多数人并不会把苹果公司和美国国家安全局视为威胁来源。相比之下,我们的方案要好得多。
Are you cool with it? And also, that threat model is probably good for the majority of people. Like, I think most people don't have Apple and and the NSA and their threat model. And this is significantly better than that.
而且,你知道,我想做的是比魔法备份发票更进一步的方案,但他们的思路是对的。他们的用户体验设计得很好。我只是觉得我们的方案更安全——应该说安全得多。关键在于用户的实际行为,你必须思考:人们真正会怎么做?对吧?
And and, you know, I I wanted to do something that's also a little bit better than an invoice magic backup, but they had the right idea. They had the right UX. I just think ours is a little bit more I think it's considerably more secure. And the thing is, people act and you have to think about, okay, what do people actually do? Right?
Liquid的情况也一样。人们实际用什么?他们用Satoshi的某个方案。那他们怎么处理备份?他们直接把整个助记词原封不动地存起来。
And the same thing with liquid. It's like, what do people actually use? Well, they use one of Satoshi. And what do they do with the backup? They fucking put the entire mnemonic.
老兄,人们把助记词存在LastPass里。
Dude, people put their mnemonic in last pass.
或者像苹果备忘录那样更糟糕。
Or like Apple Notes is even worse.
他们把它存在苹果备忘录里。他们把它存在谷歌云端硬盘里。他们的做法是把助记词写在纸上然后留在办公室。他们的做法是随手写在便利贴上然后弄丢。但这就是他们的真实操作。
They put it in Apple Notes. They put it in Google Drive. What they do is they put the mnemonic on a piece of paper and they leave it in their office. What they do is they scribble it on a fucking post it and they lose the post it. But that's what they actually do.
对吧?人们其实不会被黑。
Right? People don't get hacked.
截个图,存在相册或什么地方。
Take a screenshot, keep it in their photos or whatever.
他们的做法是把钱留在Coinbase上。这就是他们的操作,对吧,用个密码保护。好了,我们聊聊艺术吧。
And like what they do is they they leave it on Coinbase. That's what they do, right, with a password. Alright. So let's talk about art. Alright.
所以我他妈为什么
So why am I fucking
简单说几句。对。抱歉。
So just real quick. Yeah. Sorry.
请讲。
Go ahead.
最后但同样重要的是,如果这些都不适合你,你可以直接记下一个经典的助记词。对,当然。安全存储后,这就作为你的完整比特币备份。手机丢了?输入助记词,搞定。
And last but not least, if none of that suits you, you can just write down a classic seed phrase Yeah. Of course. Stored securely and do that as your full Bitcoin backup. You lose your You phone, you just put in your mnemonic, boom, done.
明白了。所以其实要感谢这个问题。想关闭交易所功能对吧?如果不想用交易所,其实已经有人提交了PR。
You got it. That's why thanks for the issue actually. Wanted to turn off the exchange. Right? So if you don't wanna use the exchange actually someone actually did a PR.
我看到了。
I saw that.
是我们这边。
Was in us.
很快的。大概一天左右。
Really quick. Was like a day or something.
是个网友做的公关。接受这个事实吧。对,很好。所以我确实在用可恢复的热钱包,因为我不太懂这些。
It was a random person from the internet that did the PR. Accept them for it. Yeah. Sweet. So I want I actually do use recoverable for my hot wallets because I don't know.
我大概有800美元在里面,非常方便。而且我经常卸载钱包,所以超级方便。
I got like $800 on it and it's so convenient. And I uninstall wallets all the time so it's like super convenient.
我喜欢云备份。
I like cloud backups.
但但但问题是,我显然不会他妈把我的积蓄放在云备份上,因为我的积蓄...我都不知道在哪。先说清楚,我根本没有积蓄。除了可恢复备份里的比特币,其他全丢了。就600美元,这是我全部的比特币了。
But but but the thing is I'm obviously not gonna fucking put my stash on cloud backup because because my stashes, I don't know where it is. I don't have a stash just just so we're clear. Lost all my Bitcoins except the ones in my recoverable backup. That's $600. That's all all the Bitcoins I have.
不过没错。当然。所以你能看出总体思路。核心思想就是,我想确保这对我妈来说很简单。其实我妈也是个比特币玩家。
But yeah. Of course. So so you you can see the general theme here. The general theme is, like, I wanna make I wanna make sure that's easy for my mom. My mom's a Bitcoiner, actually.
她太棒了。我想做个既适合我妈用,我自己也能用的东西。我知道这听起来老套,但你会惊讶有多少人跟我说'你做不到'。我记得比特币设计指南那群人,设计俱乐部的,他们说'你太想同时讨好极客和小白了,必须选一边'。
She's fucking awesome. I wanna make something that's easy for my mom, but also that I can use. And I know it sounds cliche, but, man, you would be shocked at the amount of people that told me, like, you cannot do that. Even I remember, like like like, I got feedback from, like, the Bitcoin design guide, the people or design club, and they're like, you know, you're you're trying too hard to like you're trying too hard to cater to both the Cyclone server and Mormies. You you have to pick one.
懂吗?要么做成麻雀钱包那样,要么做成水族箱那样。但我两个都不想选。
You know? Like, you have to just either you have to be Sparrow or you have to be Aqua. Yeah. I'm like, no. I don't wanna be either Sparrow or Aqua.
我想要我想要两者兼得。
I want I want to be both.
有个折中的办法。
There's a happy middle.
对吧?确实确实确实有个折中的办法,那就是高级选项。就像你默认选择了某条路径。如果你不清楚自己在做什么,就一路点击下一步、下一步、下一步。但如果你清楚自己的需求,就可以选择高级选项,进入更深层的高级设置。
Right? There there there is a happy middle and it's called advanced options. And it's like you had you pick a default path. If you don't know what you're doing, you click the buttons next, next, next. And if you know what you're doing, then you click the advanced option and then you go into the advanced advanced settings.
没错,作为房产经纪人,我们来聊聊ARC。ARC与Liquid或任何托管/半托管/信任最小化模式有着完全不同的权衡取舍,因为ARC有个独特功能——允许单方面退出。ARC的概念是将UTXO虚拟化为虚拟UTXO,就像把你的比特币转化为仅存在于ARC生态系统中的虚拟比特币。
Right, As a realtor, let's talk about ARC. Okay. ARC is a completely different set of trade offs than Liquid or any kind of custodial or semi custodial or trust minimized model because Arc has this very specific feature where you have unilateral exits from Arc. So Arc is a concept where you will the ARC server virtualizes UTXOs into virtual UTXOs. So it's like converting your Bitcoin into virtual Bitcoin, which only exists into the in in an ARC ecosystem.
这与Cashew或Liquid等模式不同。你持有的是1:1对应真实比特币UTXO的虚拟UTXO代币。但ARC的特别之处在于:存在预先签名的交易,即使服务器宕机,你也能不经服务器配合直接上链认领比特币。你可以随时带着资金退出。是的。
So not unlike cashew or liquid or that kind of stuff. It's a, you have a token of virtual UTXO, which is worth one to one is worth a Bitcoin UTXO. But what art does is that there is a pre signed transaction which allows you to claim the Bitcoins on chain non cooperatively with the server in case the server goes down. You can exit whenever you want with them. Yes.
你可以随时退出。即便服务器被查封或扣押,只要你选择退出,他们就无法卷走你的资金。
You can exit whenever you want. And the server can't rug you if you exit and if they get arrested or seized.
那代价是什么呢?是需要支付大量链上费用吗?
And what's the trade off is that it costs a lot of non chain fees?
是的。所以权衡点在于,假设你在ARC上有5美元,然后你进行单边退出,你可能会被抢劫。ARC还有另一种奇怪的权衡,它采用预确认交易模型,也就是说,为了获得链上保证,你需要将虚拟UTXO包含在链上的实际音乐Taproot输出中。是的,这并非免费。
Yeah. So the trade off is that let's say that you have $5 on ARC and you do a unilateral exit, like, you're gonna get robbed. And there's another kind of like weird trade off in ARC where ARC has a pre confirmed transaction model, which is like, you can have a in order to get the on chain guarantee on ARC, you need to include your virtual UTXO in an actual music Taproot output on chain. Yeah. And that's not free.
对吧?ARC ASP需要发布比特币交易来更新状态,我猜。
Right? The Arc ASP needs to publish a Bitcoin transaction in order to update, I guess, The states.
他们多久做一次这个操作?
How often are they doing this?
老兄,如果我解释错了,Alex会杀了我的,但他们想什么时候做就什么时候做。
Man, if I dude, Alex is gonna kill me if I explain Art wrong, but they will do that whenever they want.
好的,谢谢。我之后会邀请Alex上节目。
Well, thanks. I'll have Alex on at some point.
展开剩余字幕(还有 290 条)
你知道,我猜大概一天一次?或者一天几次?这样你就不必非得有链上保证,因为你可以选择不要链上保证。这种情况下,如果ARC服务器与发送方勾结,就可能双花你的资金。所以如果有链上保证,你就不会被坑。
You know, I'm I'm assuming something like like my assumption Like once a day or something? Like a couple times a day or something like And that, you don't end, but you don't have to have on chain guarantee because if you can choose to not have the on chain guarantee. And in that case, the ARC server, if it colludes with the sender, can double spend you. Right? So so if you have the unction guarantee, you can't you can't be rugged.
如果没有链上保证,你就得相信ARC服务器不会勾结作恶。
If you don't have the unction guarantee, you trust that the ARC server is not colluding It's not malicious.
这必须是主动恶意的行为。
It needs to be actively malicious.
这就像零确认交易。对。但零确认的问题是ASP需要主动串通对付你,对吧?所以对于任何情况...比如说我是个商家,收到150美元的晚餐费用,ARC组织会对我进行双花攻击吗?
It's it's like a zero con transaction. Yeah. But the thing with a zero con but the ASP needs to like actively collude against you, right? So for anything that's like alright. So let's say I'm a merchant and I'm getting paid like, I don't know, $150 for dinner, is the ARC organization going to double spend me?
他们是否与买单的人串通?
Are they colluding with the person buying dinner?
是的。我是说,不,其实...
Yes. I mean, again, no, there's like
这种情况发生的概率
The probability of that happening
很低。所以我真的需要这150美元上链到Taproot Music输出吗?不需要。但如果我是大机构或大商户,那就没问题。而且我现在开始担心ARC服务器可能会宕机,你知道...
is low. So do I really need that $150 to be on chain claimable in a Taproot Music output? No. But if I'm a large organization or a large merchant, that's fine. Like and, you know, I'm getting to the point where where I might also be afraid that the ARC server goes down, you know, like
没错。对。如果我错了请纠正。所以这就是为什么需要平衡,比如每天操作一次之类的。对吧?
So but that's right. Yeah. Correct me if I'm wrong. So that's why, like, there's a balancing act there where you do it once a day or something. Right?
是的。就像是,好吧。有个结算过程。对吧?比如每天一次它会结算,然后你就可以
Yeah. It's like, okay. There's a settlement. Right? Like once a day is it kind of settles and then you can have
作为终端用户,我...我...我会为结算付费。对吧?所以Arc...我是说,我不清楚定价模型,但你可以想象如果Arc支付链上费用,他们最终会把这部分转嫁给终端用户。
Like as the as the end user, I'm I'm I'm gonna pay for the settlement. Right? So so the Arc I mean, I don't know what the pricing model, but you you can imagine that if Arc is paying the on chain fees, they're eventually gonna pass that on to their end user.
会变得很贵,特别是费用上涨时。如果我们真的看好比特币,费用很可能会上涨。而且
Gets expensive, especially if fees go up. If we're actually bullish on Bitcoin, fees should probably go up. And
Arc还存在另一个问题,就是Arc服务器需要锁定流动性来支撑ARC网络。所以你的虚拟UTXO会过期。实际上它现在大约50天或60天左右就会过期。所以你需要刷新UTXO,这就有在线要求。这就是为什么人们说需要信心来让ARK变得更好。
there's another problem with Arc, which is that the Arc server needs to lock up liquidity to kind of like front the ARC network. So your virtual UTXO will expire. It actually expires in like right now, think it's like fifty days or something or like sixty days or something. So you need to refresh your UTXO and there is a liveness requirement to that. And that's why people say that you need confidence to make ARK better.
因为
Because
这样会更便宜。
It makes it cheaper.
好吧。我有点超纲了,因为你知道,我...我...我不是比特币脚本专家,但我的理解是Convenience可以让人们无需在线要求就能刷新VUTXO,就是不需要钱包一直在线。但关键是我们可以用软件解决这些问题。这不需要协议变更。对吧?所以对于
Well, okay. And I'm going above my pay rate here because you know, I'm I'm I'm not I'm not a Bitcoin script guy, but my understanding is that Convenience would allow people to refresh their VUTXOs without a liveness requirement, like without your wallet being on But the thing is that we can solve these problems with software. That's not protocol changes. Right? So for
例如,问题就像试图将CTV作为软件实现,虽然这对ARC可能很理想,但可能性微乎其微
example problem is like getting CTV as a software, while it might be ideal for ARC, it seems very unlikely that we're
我们只能假设这不会发生
We have to assume that it's not going happen.
就像比特币持有者坚信软件永远不可能
The same way to be a Bitcoiner is to assume no software will ever
发生。确实如此。如果你的商业模式建立在软件基础上,注定会失败。闪电网络就发生过同样的情况。那么,当你的节点离线时会发生什么?
happen. Exactly. If you base your business model on a software, you're going to get wrecked. So, the same thing happened with Lightning. So, what happens if your node is offline when there is a
对于闪电网络,我们进行了软分叉
For Lightning, we got the soft
是的,我们确实为闪电网络做了软分叉,但仍需要设置监控时段。对吧?所以如果你的闪电节点离线了,就会出现所谓的...总之会有退出交易
fork. Yeah, but we did get the soft fork for Lightning but we still have to have a watch hour. Right? So so if your Lightning node goes offline and there is a what's called? Anyway, there's an exit transaction.
没错。你会面临惩罚性交易。对,惩罚机制。就像你的节点必须保持清醒
Yeah. You're you're no A penalty transaction. Yeah. Punsit. Like, you're no needs to wake up.
对吧?否则对方可以卷走你所有的钱。是的。所以这就是为什么我们要有瞭望塔这个概念。这也是我现在专门在这里的原因之一
Right? That's Otherwise, your counterparty can take all your money. Yes. So that's why we have the concept of watchtower. So, like, one of the reasons why I am here specifically right now
而且这就像是,你必须离线两周左右。
And it's also, like, you have to be offline for, two weeks or something.
是啊,没错。
Yeah. Yeah.
是啊是啊。但我的意思是,实际上大多数人并没有使用瞭望塔,而且我们很少看到那种攻击发生。
Yeah. Yeah. But, I mean In practice, most people aren't using watchtowers, and we rarely ever see that attack happen.
没错。ARC也是同样道理。如果你在线,就可以刷新。但如果你在V使用期限到期时不在线,就有轻量级要求。所以我们正在研究的东西有点像瞭望塔模式,但属于委托刷新模式,对吧?
That's right. It's the same thing for ARC. If you're online, then you can refresh. But if you're not online when your V usage expires, there is a lightness requirement. So stuff that we are going to work on is kind of like a watchtower model, but a delegate refresh model, right?
比如钱包运营商(如Bull)可以运行一个委托服务器,用户相当于在概念上告诉我们:'这些是我的VUTXO,这是它们的到期时间,到期时请帮我刷新'。
Where maybe the wallet operator like bull, we can run a delegate server so that the user tell It's like conceptually the user is telling us like, Hey, these are my VUTXOs, this is when they expire, like refresh them for me when it's time to refresh for me.
对对,正是如此。所以这就像
Yeah, yeah, exactly. So it's just
就像一项想要提供帮助的服务。所以,有些这类权衡可以通过软分叉在一定程度上得到固定或缓解。我们会尽全力去解决这些问题。
like a service to help. So that's, there's like some of these trade offs that are somewhat fixed or mitigated by a soft fork. We're gonna try our very best to fix them with with
听起来像是
It like sounds like
没有这些也能运作。它是可行的,在Liquid网络中,你实际上无法进行双花。它更像是具有更强的终局性,但没有退出交易,对吧?
they're workable without. It's it's it's it's workable without and like the the so so liquid is kind of like in liquid, you can't really be double spent. It's like there's like more finality, but there's no exit transaction. Right?
没有退出交易真的很糟糕。
Which is really bad that there's no exit transaction.
当然很糟糕。这正是
Of course, it's bad. And that's the that's the
这就是闪电网络的美妙之处。闪电网络有一系列权衡,使得它在用户体验和自主保管方面相当糟糕,但
That's the beauty of Lightning. Like, Lightning has a bunch of trade offs that make it kind of shitty UX wise, self custody wise, but at
最终
the end of
那一天,我可以随时无需任何许可就脱离链上或回到链上。闪电网络真是个奇迹。太神奇了,对吧?简直不可思议。
the day, I can always escape off chain, on chain myself without any permission. Lightning is a miracle. It's amazing. Right? It's amazing.
然后还有个叫Spark的项目。说实话,我没深入研究Spark纯粹是因为感觉不对。完全是凭直觉。
And then so there is another one called Spark. I'm going to be honest, I didn't look into Spark because of the vibes. It's purely vibes.
这是客户端的专业氛围感。
It's clients pro vibes.
对,纯粹是审美问题,还有像Spark和Arcade这样的项目。Arc是协议名称,而Arcade是具体实现——熟悉Alex V、Tiero和Cooks的人都知道,这些可都是传奇人物?真他妈
Yeah, it's purely aesthetics and also like Spark and Arcade. So Arc is the name of the protocol. Arcade is the one implementation that people who are familiar with Alex V and Tiero and Cooks, these are Legends in their own right? Fucking
我的
my
最爱。我如此痴迷ARC的主要原因之一,就是这领域有我敬重的人。有Breeze的Roy,有我在Liquids时期就认识的Tiero,还有Cooks。
favorites. The One reasons why I'm so into ARC is because there's people I respect in this space. There's Roy from Breeze. There's Tiero, which I knew from the Liquids days. And there's Cooks.
对吧?而且还有Bolts。
Right? And and there's Bolts.
Freeze。Cooks虽然低调,但他最出名的是BTC Pay服务器。他深度参与了BTC Pay服务器,并且实际上是Noster的联合创始人之一,与Fial Jeff共同创立。这些人的共同点是
And Freeze. Just Cooks like has a very low profile but he's most well known for BTC Pay server. He was heavily involved in BTC Pay server and he's actually one of the co creators of Noster alongside Fial Jeff. And what these guys have in common
他们说到做到。没错,他们真他妈能交付。Thierry能交付,Cooks能交付,Roy能交付,Bolts能交付。巧的是,我们都在Arcade Day,对Arc兴奋不已。
is they ship. Yeah. They fucking deliver. Like, Thierry delivers, Cooks delivers, Roy delivers, Bolts delivers. And coincidentally, we were all at Arcade Day, very excited about Arc.
所以Arc有一种'干就完了'的心态。公平地说,Spark也确实交付了。
So there is a let's fucking ship mentality with Arc. To be fair, Spark also did ship.
他们很聪明。很多人低估了他们。他们的交付速度快得惊人。
They Smart Smart They've been a lot of people have underestimated. They've shipped like crazy.
没错。而且Spark是以一种企业化的方式在交付,他们正在
Yeah. And and and Spark is shipping in a kind of a corporate way where they are like going after
瞄准交易所之类的。它更...更精致。目前更容易在其基础上开发。
exchanges and like It's more it's more polished. It's easier to build on right now.
Spark收购了一家支付处理器,以便进入金融科技支付领域。
Spark bought a payment processor in order to get inside FinTech payment space.
嗯,当你获得A16z种子轮1.65亿美元投资时,确实很有帮助。
Well, it helps when you get $165,000,000 with A16z seed investment.
说实话,这确实没什么坏处。不过,我不想对Spark发表负面评价,只是...
That doesn't hurt to be perfectly honest. However, and I don't want to say anything negative about Spark. It's just
那我直说吧,目前最大的问题在隐私方面。他们基本上是基于MercuryLayer(一种状态链实现)构建Spark,然后剥离了隐私功能,甚至让隐私性变得更差。所以目前的情况,你可以类比Tron的信任模型——讽刺的是很多人使用Tron,用Tron自托管的人比比特币还多。
Well, I'll go out there. The biggest negative right now is on the privacy side. They basically modeled Spark off of MercuryLayer, which is a state chain implementation, and then they stripped the privacy stuff out, and then they made it even less private. So, right now, as it currently stands, you can kind of think of like the Tron Trust model, which ironically, a lot of people use Tron. More people use Tron self custody than Bitcoin.
但这只是个单一可重复使用的地址。如果你有某人的Spark地址,在闪电网络支付一次后,就能看到他们所有的交易记录和当前余额。不过反过来说,它的开发门槛确实很低。
But it's just a single reusable address. So, if you have someone's Spark address, if you pay them once on Lightning and you have their Spark address, you can see every transaction they've ever made, including their current balance. Yeah. But on the alternate side, it's really easy to build on.
确实。我认为ARC需要重点解决的问题之一也是隐私,因为ASP...你可以把ARC想象成私有内存池,即ASP的私有内存池。显然ASP能看到所有VETXO,但用户看不到我们的私有内存池——理论上他们可以公开这些数据。
Yeah, for sure. And one of the things that ARC, I think, we will have to work on is the privacy as well because of course the ASP, you can you can think of you can think of ARC as like a private mempool, which is the ASP's private mempool. So obviously the ASP can see all of the VETXOs. You as a user, you can't see like the mempool as our private mempool. Presumably, they can make it public.
所以这并不是说它比比特币在隐私方面有本质提升,就像Liquid虽然对比特币有隐私改进,但它也存...
So it's not I don't think it's an improvement necessarily of privacy over Bitcoin in the same way that like liquid, it has a privacy improvement over Bitcoin even though liquid also has a
UTXO...这个类比不完美,但我称之为'托管式隐私模型'——你把隐私托付给了第三方。
UTX It's not a perfect analogy, but I call it a custodial privacy model. You're trusting a third party with your privacy.
是的。我是说,人们已经信任电子服务器了,比如互联网上那些随机的电子服务器。但关于ARK交易的关键在于,它们在ARC网络内部基本上是免费的。没错。如果是免费的,我就不太确定了。
Yeah. I mean, people already trust electron servers, like random electron servers on the internet. So but the thing about ARK transaction is that they're essentially free inside the ARC network. Yeah. And if they're free, I don't know.
也许我们可以同时做Coin Jones和ARC。我也不确定。现在还处于早期阶段。但我对参与ARC特别是Arcade的团队很有信心,他们都是从事过隐私技术开发的人。我认为我们能解决这个问题。
Maybe we can do Coin Jones and ARC. I don't know. Like, it's it's still early. I'm I'm I'm I'm confident that the guys involved in ARC and Arcade specifically are people that have worked on privacy technologies. Think we're gonna be able to solve that.
Arc的特点是它有不同的权衡取舍,但确实有一些非常、非常棒的功能。那么它会取代Liquid吗?
So the thing about Arc is that it has different trade offs, but it has some really, really neat features. So is it going to replace liquid?
对,这正是我下一个问题。未来有没有可能从Bull钱包中移除Liquid,用Arc来替代它?
Yeah, that's my next question. Is there a future where liquid gets removed from the Bull Wallet and Arc gets replaced with it?
百分之百存在这样的未来。在即时支付钱包——也就是默认给那些不清楚自己在做什么的用户接收资金的版本——里肯定会有这样的未来。
There there there's a 100% of future. There's a 100 of future where the instant payments wallet, which is like the default one that the the user that doesn't know what he's doing is the one that he's receiving funds into.
是啊。
Yeah.
存在这样一个未来,它会出现在我们的钱包里。这个未来可能很近,也可能很远。
There is a future where that's in our wallet. And that future might be close, might be far.
你认为中期未来会是两者并存还是会出现一个统一术语?因为这也让人很困惑。
Do you think the middle future is like you have both in there or is there gonna be a word? Because that gets confusing too.
我是说,就像我看到的
I mean, there's like Did I see
你在网上发的一张截图,好像是关于用ARC的?对。那是什么情况?只是测试吗?
a screenshot that you posted online that was like bull using ARC? Yeah. So What's going on there? Is that just testing?
这是在主网用真钱测试。我现在主网上就有ARC。当然有些问题,比如你说的'晚上能睡着'——让我能安心睡觉的是,我现在还不放心让你用ARC。因为UTXO过期问题还没完全解决,单边退出的用户体验也没做好。
I mean, it's testing on mainnet with real money. So it is I have ARC on the mainnet right now. So of course, there are things that when you say like sleep at night, like what makes me sleep at night, There are I'm not comfortable with onboarding you to ARC right now. I would feel bad because UTXO expiry stuff is not really solved. There's no UX around the unilateral exit.
关于UTXO委托刷新的用户体验也没完善。所以还有些缺失的功能。而Liquid已经存在十年了。所以需要给它些时间。但我认为那个未来比我们想的要近得多。
There's no UX around the delegation delegated refresh of the UTXO. So there's like stuff that's missing. Whereas on Liquid, mean, Liquid exists for ten years. So it's like, give it some time. But I think that future is a lot closer we think.
比如有个叫'层次'的钱包对吧?它有点像集合了所有二层方案,你可以选你的二层网络。但钱包里有个信息板块,我在那解释ARC和Liquid的安全性。想象下我解释的样子:'对,选你的网络'。
And like, okay, so there's a wallet, it's called layers. Right? And layers is kinda like, we have all the layer twos and like, you can choose your layer two, but that's it's it's like, man, there's like this info thing in the wallets where I explain the art, the liquid security. Imagine me explain like Yeah. Choose your network.
这就是权衡所在。
Like, here's the trade off.
当你这样做的时候,我已经失去了用户。
I've already lost the user when you're doing that.
我必须替他们做出选择。我选择手机。
I I have to make that choice for them. I have to choose the phone.
我是喜欢它们,但如果用户需要观看我们的BTC会议视频,那我们就已经偏离主题了。是的,当然。你本不该那么做。
Like, I love them, but like, if if a user needs to watch it to our BTC sessions video, like, we've already lost the plot. Yeah. Of course. You should never have to do that.
这很简单。Volvic必须决定默认是ARC、Liquid、Spark、State Chain还是Mercury或其他什么。我会根据我认为正确的来做决定。目前来看,Liquid显然是首选。Liquid是现在,Arc是未来。
It's very simple. So Volvic one is gonna have to decide whether the default is ARC or Liquid or Spark or State Chain or Mercury or whatever it is. And I'm gonna make that decision based on what I think is right. And I think right now, of course, liquid is the obvious choice. Liquid is the now, Arc is the future.
Arc还涉及其他类似DeFi的影响,这让人们非常兴奋。我倒不是,我比较单纯,只想用比特币买水果。
And Arc also has other kind of like DeFi implications to it, which get people really excited. Not me really, I'm more of a dumb dumb. I just wanna pay for my fruits with Bitcoin.
我不需要什么该死的寿司交换
I don't need a fucking sushi swap
交易所。对,没错。
exchange. Yeah. Right.
那么
So
我希望人们能用比特币支付并赚取比特币。这就是我想要的。
I want people to pay with Bitcoin and earn Bitcoin. That's what that's what I want.
然后我觉得,在所谓的DeFi领域可能有点价值的就是借贷这类东西。但对我来说问题始终在于,归根结底,如果我用比特币抵押贷款,首先你得非常谨慎,因为很多人就是这样破产的。其次,我银行账户里需要的是美元。所以无论如何都绕不开中心化元素。那我们为什么要假装...为什么要搞这么复杂的鲁布·戈德堡机械式操作?明明里面已经有Tether了(所以你信任Tether),然后某处还连着你的银行账户(所以你信任银行账户)?
And then I guess, like, the one thing that might be valuable in quote unquote in the DeFi's place is like lending stuff. But then the question to me is always like, at the end of the day, if I take a loan out of my Bitcoin, first of all, you should be very careful with it because that's how people get wrecked. But then second of all, I need dollars in my bank account. So, there's going to be centralized elements regardless. Well, there's So why are we pretending Why are we doing this huge Rube Goldberg machine when you have Tether in there, so you're trusting Tether and then you have your bank account in there somewhere, so you're trusting your bank account?
我不想深入讨论细节,但市场上确实可以存在几乎无需信任的稳定币。我们可以创造...但问题是
I'm not gonna go too much into I'm the not gonna go too much in details, but you can have very trustless, almost trustless stablecoins on market. Can have we can make But is
是不是类似那种...类似die之类的?就是比特币抵押的算法稳定币?
it was that like is it like die or something? Like, it's like Bitcoin collateralized algorithmic stablecoin?
有点类似。就像是...
It kind of. It's like
那些东西也经常爆炸。
Those have a tendency to blow up too.
对吧?想想看,在Arc上,你可以从Arc的VUTXO进行单边退出。你还可以在比特币上对稳定币进行单边退出。对吧?这是ARK使之成为可能的功能。
Right? So think of the fact that on Arc, you have the unilateral exits from the Arc VUTXO. You can have a unilateral exit on Bitcoin from a stablecoin. Right? That's something that ARK makes possible.
这很酷。
That's cool.
这确实很酷,而且可能是ARK除了比特币之外唯一让我感兴趣的地方。我们在ARK上还能做的另一种事情是这类无需信任的交换,比如你现在用比特币交易稳定币时,通常需要中心化对手方,但类似Bolt的模式可以实现原子交换。你可以在比特币和稳定币之间进行原子交换。好,这是从股票角度说的。
It cool and it's probably the only thing about ARK that's not Bitcoin that interests me. The other thing that we can do on ARK is like these kind of like trustless swaps between, like, you know, if you're you're trading Bitcoin for stable coins right now, there's a centralized counterparty, but kind of like the Bolt's model where you can have atomic swap. You can have an atomic swap between a Bitcoin and stable coin. Okay. That's from stock.
但实际上,这就像是锦上添花。属于DeFi范畴,我个人对此不感兴趣。
But really, this is like, it's like icing on the cake. It's DeFi stuff. I'm not interested in it personally.
我喜欢支付这个应用场景。
I like the payments use case.
我也喜欢支付应用场景,而且我认为除了Spark这种全新模式外,Arc是目前唯一的解决方案。对吧?因为像cashew、fatty、liquid本质上都是同类产品。对吧?它们要么有托管方,要么有实体在担保锚定。
I like the payments use case and I think Arc is the only thing that has come up other than Spark, which is like a fully new model. Right? Like because cashew, fatty, liquid, it's the same kind of thing. Right? It's like you have a custodian or you have an entity which is guaranteeing a peg, whatever.
cashew、fatty、liquid就像是同一事物的不同版本,而ARC则完全是全新的东西。
It's like cashew, fatty, liquid are like different shades of the same thing. Whereas ARC is a completely new thing.
我认为一个很好的类比是闪电网络。它从根本上说,是的,是一种根本性的创新,为比特币支付提供了新方式。
I think a good comparison is like Lightning. It's like fundamentally Yeah. A fundamentally innovative Yeah. New way for Bitcoin payment.
完全同意。作为早期爱好者,我们在2019年就整合了闪电网络,但直到2022年才在主网上线,花了三年时间就是因为当时技术还不成熟。
Absolutely. And like as a as a fanboy of, you know, like who we Bol Bol was we integrated Lightning in 2019. Right. But we launched it on Mainnet in 2022. Took us three years to do that just because it wasn't ready.
但你看,我总是第一个尝试新事物——最早接入闪电网络,最早使用液态网络,现在出于某种虚荣心,我也想成为第一个运行ARC的人。实际上ARC已经在Bull钱包里能用了,如果你有超级用户权限的话可以从那里发送交易。不过我不打算公开这个功能,有点担心安全性。
But like, I I was like, first to jump on Lightning, first to jump on Liquid, and like, just out of, I guess, just out of ego, I wanna be the first one to to run on ARC. So ARC actually does work in the Bull Wallet. Like, you can send from like the Bull Wallet if you have access to the super user mode. And I I don't think I'm gonna give it to the side. I'm a little scared.
确实存在超级用户模式。你得在钱包里按特定操作才能解锁ARC功能,但现阶段使用ARC确实存在风险。
There is a super user mode. You don't ask me nicely, I'll give you the codes. You have to tap certain things in the wallets and then access the Arc wallets. But it is reckless. Arc, it's reckless right now.
所以建议只用零花钱来测试。不过它确实能运行,我们拥有顶尖的工程师团队。我不仅想在钱包里集成ARC,还想把它应用到交易所,PageJoin也是同样的情况。
So so do it it really is. So, like, do that with, like, pocket money. But but yeah. So so it it does work and, like, we have the best best engineers ever and, like, really excited to and of course, like, not only do I want ARC in the wallet, I want ARC in the exchange. Same thing with PageJoin.
PageJoin目前只在钱包端可用,没上交易所完全不是因为法律问题,纯粹是技术原因——就像之前说的,PageJoin v2版本还不稳定容易出故障。会议演示时你我测试无所谓,但用户购买100美元比特币时绝不能出问题。
PageJoin is in the wallet right now. It's not in the exchange and it's not for legal reasons at all. It's literally just because what we're talking about earlier, like page on v two is like reckless and it just it just kind of breaks. So it's it's it's fine if it's you and me testing a page on at a conference, but like if someone's buying like a $100 worth of Bitcoin, I don't want the page to fail.
确实如此。不过我认为金额不大的话,资金风险应该很小。
Yeah. Of course. But still, I don't think money would be a lot there's no risk of money.
不,钱不会丢失。这有点像邮寄交易。是的,页面可能会卡住,然后会有回退交易。
No. Money wouldn't be lost. It was just kinda like Mailed transaction. Yeah. The page would like to get stuck and then there would be a fallback transaction.
这其实有点让人恼火。但,是的,我确实想尝试ARC,我想用ARC和Bull Bitcoin交易所做实验,让Bull Bitcoin始终成为技术最先进、最前沿的交易所。我们的目标一直都是成为行业典范,成为别人效仿的模型。
It was kind of, like, piss people off, really. But, yeah, I I do wanna have ARC ARC I I wanna play with ARC and and the Bull Bitcoin exchange and, like, make make that like, I want Bull Bitcoin to be always, like, the the most technologically advanced exchange at the at the at the forefront. And, like, our goal really has always been, like, just just looking, like, the the be the model. Like, I wanna be the I wanna be I wanna be the model that, like, people emulate.
好的,我快速问几个话题。简单回到Liquid的话题,感觉Liquid在隐私方面还能做得更多。你一直深度参与Liquid网络管理之类的工作。
Okay. I got couple more topics real quick. Just real quick back to Liquid. It feels like Liquid could do a little bit more on the privacy side. You've been very involved, like, in liquid network management and whatnot.
那边有什么有趣的更新吗?还是说基本停滞了,维持现状?我们已经有保密交易功能了,是不是该对现有成果感到满意了?
Do you is there any interesting updates happening there on that side, or is it kind of stagnant and it is what it is, and we have confidential transactions and we should just be I mean happy with what we have.
在协议层面,我认为能做的改进不多了,但
At the protocol level, I don't think there's much more that can be done, but there's
甚至不是在协议层面。
Or not even the protocol level.
我是说,没有什么能阻止你在这方面变得更精通。
I mean, there's there's nothing stopping be savvy about it.
是的,当然。
Yeah. Of course.
当然。目前没有任何东西能阻止人们进行类似quandones和liquid这样的操作。
Of course. There there's nothing stopping anyone right now from doing quandones and liquid like that.
嗯,没有应用程序。没人愿意这么做。
Well, there's no app. No one wants to do it.
我是说,我认为没人需要它,因为liquid有个非常有趣的特点,就是链分析对它不起作用,因为链分析依赖的是——我是说,它可能可以,但链分析的一个主要启发式方法是变更检测。
I mean, I think no one wants it because liquid has a really funny thing, which is that chain analysis doesn't work on liquid because chain analysis uses I mean, it could but one of the main heuristics of chain analysis is change detection.
具体来说,比如整数金额。对。你看不到它是因为——那些怪才们知道这一点——但链分析和链监控的工作原理都是概率分析。他们试图找出所有权何时变更。所以当你没有具体金额时,难度就大得多。
Specifically like round amounts. Yeah. And if you don't see it because and the freaks know this but the way chain analysis works and chain surveillance works is all probability analysis. And they're trying to figure out when ownership changes. So when you don't have the amounts, it makes it much more difficult.
这让事情变得非常、非常、非常困难。但如果你发送的是最大金额,那么仍然可以——因为没有找零,就会变得有点明显,诸如此类。
It makes it really, really, really hard. But if you're like sending max amounts, then you can still there's no change, it gets becomes a little bit obvious, stuff like that.
不不不,没有没有。你说得对。是的。所以如果你在操作最大值,而且还有个新情况。就像liquid上有大量页面一样。
There's there's no there's no no. You're right. Yeah. So if you're doing maximum and and also, there's a new thing. It's like there are a lot of page on on liquid.
是的。关于Yeah的页面多得很。
Yeah. There's a tons of page on Yeah.
所以页面确实有效。它在液体上的改进甚至比在变更上更好,因为数量是混合的。
So page on does do. It it even better improvement on liquid that it does on change because the amounts are blended.
之所以有这么多关于液体的页面,是因为所有在液体上进行的USDT与比特币互换都使用了一种类似非托管模式的侧边互换,每次互换都是一个液体页面。所以很多交易实际上是液体或页面。这是链分析核心的共同输入所有权启发式。你认为Boltz会
And the reason why there's so many page on liquid is that all the USDT to Bitcoin swaps happening on liquids are used using a like somewhat non custodial model called side swap and every swap is a page on liquid. So a lot of transactions are liquid or actually page on. So the common input ownership heuristic which is the core of chain analysis. Do you think Boltz will
也这样做吗?默认情况下会做页面吗?也许这就是我们需要的全部。也许这会带来巨大的升级。这取决于双方。
do that as well? Do page ons by default? Because maybe that's all we need. Maybe that makes a huge upgrade. That's up to both.
我要说的是,随着页面合并1.0.0的出现,许多事情变得比以前更有可能。页面合并确实有点鲁莽。还有页面合并D3,它是页面合并的退出迭代,是多方的页面合并,实际上在某种程度上是一种硬币合并。
What I will say is that with the advent of page join 1.0.0, many things become more possible than they were before. Like Page Join was definitely a little reckless. And then there's also Page Join D3 which is an exit iteration of Page Join which is multi party Page Joins which is effectively a coin join in a way.
我们也可以把它应用到液体上。
And we could drop in that onto Liquid too.
是的,当然。
Yeah, of course.
液态网络的一个酷炫之处在于它与比特币非常相似。
That's one the cool parts about liquid is it's very similar to Bitcoin.
它就像是比特币的一个分叉,你可以随意尝试。由于它是中心化的,我们可以无忧无虑地更新它。但关于PageRailing,我有个人的、发自内心的憎恶——针对某些链分析公司,说来话长,改天再聊。我极其厌恶链分析,推动我实现Page On的动机之一就是我认为这些链分析公司都是胡扯。他们是骗子,是冒牌货,
It's like a fork of Bitcoin where you can just play around with it. And since it's centralized, we can update it without too many worries. But no, the thing about PageRailing that really So I have a specific, personal and very visceral hatred of chain analysis of some chain analysis companies for it's a long story, I'll share one day. I really dislike Chain Analysis and one of the motivations for me to make Page On a reality is that I actually believe that the Chain Analysis companies are bullshits. They're phonies, they're fake,
他们是巫毒术士。他们做了很多坏事,但最恶劣的是这一点。
they're voodoo. They do a lot of bad things but that's the worst part.
没错。他们就是占星师之流,最终干的事就是制造大量误判——让无辜的比特币用户被诬陷做了坏事,实际上他们根本没做错任何事。对。
Right. They're they're astrologers and what they end at when they end up what they end up doing is they do a lot of false positive where where bit corners who are innocent are have evidence against them on shame that they did something wrong where they they did it. They didn't do anything wrong and Right.
这是概率分析,当概率只有60%时,那些链分析公司却假装是100%。他们假装这是确凿无疑的。
It's probability analysis and like when it's 60% probability, the chain of analyst firms, they like pretend it's a 100%. They pretend it's definitive.
他们说有60%的可能性。对吧?但这个数字完全是他们从屁眼里瞎扯出来的。
They say it's 60% probable. Right? But that number is fucking pulled out of their buttholes completely.
对吧?10%。
Right? 10%.
对。这就像你要么做了要么没做,对吧?犯罪就像霸凌。你不是60%有罪,但司法体系的问题在于轻信了China Nassas的说辞,部分原因是基于那个常见的输入所有权启发式方法。所以如果我们摧毁这个启发式方法,那之后任何链分析证据还能在法庭上被采信吗?
Right. And it's like you either did it or didn't do it, right? It's like crime is bullying. You're not 60% guilty, but the problem with the justice system is taking China Nassas' word for it because it has partly because based on the common common input ownership heuristic. So if we destroy that heuristic, then is any chain analysis evidence ever missable in court after that?
因为如果链分析我
Because if chain analysis I
有观点认为它本来就不该被采信。更何况现在。
there's an argument it shouldn't be admissible already. But even more so.
没错。因为你知道,他们很可能会说我们的报告有坚实依据。而我可以说,你们的所谓坚实依据是基于这个已不再成立的现实前提。所以你们那该死的分析全垮了。在这方面第一页真的很棒。另外第一页还有个绝妙之处是它允许任何人参与,比如PayJoin爱好者,太棒了。
Right. Because, you know, chances are gonna say like, we have some solid reasoning behind our report And I can be like, well, your solid reasoning is based on this realistic, which is no longer correct. So all of your fucking analysis falls apart. So page one is really cool in that regards. Also, a really neat thing about page one is that it allows for anyone such as fan of PayJoin, great.
它还能被动整合比特币。当你有很多小额UTXO在钱包里时,整合很重要——因为未来如果手续费上涨,每个UTXO都会产生交易费。所以你需要整合,对吧?但人们既不知道应该整合,也不懂如何操作。
It also passive consolidation of Bitcoin. So when you consolidate, when you have a lot of small UTXOs in your wallets, that's not a good thing because in the future, if the fees go up, you will be paying transaction fees for every little UTXO you have in your wallet. So you want to consolidate. Right? But people don't know that they should consolidate and they don't know how to consolidate.
UTXO数量少能节省手续费,但会损害隐私性。
Less UTXOs are better fee wise, but worse privacy wise.
完全正确。所以顺便说下自动交换功能,我认为100万聪的UTXO在隐私性和...我觉得100万聪UTXO现在应该作为默认设置。但如果你坚持
Exactly. Exactly. So that's why by the way with the auto swap, I think that a million SAT UTXO is like the right trade off between privacy and I think the million SAT UTXO is like it's like should be the default right now. But if you are push
但我喜欢这样。
it but I like it.
是啊是啊,听起来很不错。
Yeah. Yeah. It's it's sounds it's nice.
100到10万在经济上可能永远都是可支配的。至少在接下来的十年内是这样。
A 100 a 100,000 will probably always be economically spendable. Yeah. Like at least in the next ten years
确实如此。但一百万个UTXO相当于一千美元。如果咖啡店老板知道你有一千美元,而人人都有这一千美元,你明白我的意思吗?
or Yeah. That's true. But a million UTXOs is a thousand bucks. If the coffee shop owner knows that you had a thousand bucks, everybody has a thousand bucks. You know what I mean?
我同意。
I agree.
这是个不错的交易。
It's a good trade.
所以如果你钱包里有UTXO,合并的方式就是把这些UTXO发给自己。全部发给自己。是的。但如果你的钱包支持PayJoin,当我给你发送比特币时,作为接收方的你会在不知不觉中被动完成合并。对。
So if you have UTXOs in your wallet, the way that you would consolidate is by sending those UTXOs to yourself. Send all to myself. Yes. But if you have PayJoin in your wallet and I am sending you Bitcoins you are consolidating passively without realizing it as a receiver. Yeah.
这简直太棒了。
Which is fucking awesome.
因为作为接收方,我在贡献一个输入。对。然后你也贡献一个输入。对。然后我得到一个更大的输入。
Because as a receiver, I'm contributing an input. Yeah. And then you're contributing an input. Yeah. And then I get one bigger input.
是的。是的。所以这就是所谓的爱的支付联合。
Yes. Yes. So that's that's the love pay join.
但我想你贡献两个输入,我贡献两个输入。我贡献一个输入,对吧?然后我们就没问题了。
But I guess you contribute two inputs, I contribute two inputs. I contribute one input, right? And then we're good.
我们我们可以编程让支付联合做任何我们想做的事。比如,大胆的比特币钱包可以有合并模式,对吧?
We we we we can program pay join to do whatever we want. Like, the bold Bitcoin wallets could have consolidation mode, right? Where
我喜欢这个。你知道吗
I like that. You know what
我是说?比如,假设你有10个输入,你有10个UTXO,但你只需要贡献两个,你可以选择在那个页面贡献所有。我们可以根据当时的网络费用设置合并模式。你可以说,嘿,如果费用低于这个数额
I mean? Like, okay, let's say you have 10 inputs, you have 10 UTXOs, but you only need to contribute two, you can choose to contribute all of them in that page. And we can have the consolidation mode as it's also based on the network fees at the time. You can say, Hey, if the fees are less than this amount
这就是为什么我认为在Liquid网络上特别有帮助,因为手续费简直便宜得离谱,大概就33美分左右。而且如果
Well, that's why I think it'd be particularly helpful on the liquid side because fees are so fucking cheap. It's like 33¢ or something. And if
你在整合比特币,或许可以通过互换来整合。如果你有很多小额UTXO需要合并,这样合并后链上所有人都能看出它们属于同一个人,除非金额很大。但如果你通过互换合并到Liquid再换回比特币,得到的新比特币就完全与原比特币没有关联了。所以说混币并不是唯一方案。
you're consolidating Bitcoin, maybe you can consolidate it inside a swap. So you have tons of small UTXOs you want to consolidate, you're not going to gain backwards privacy because once the coins are consolidated on chain, we can all see that they're linked to the same person Unless it's a big one. But if you consolidate into a swap, you consolidate into liquids and then you swap it back to Bitcoin like that new Bitcoin that you got is completely unlinked. It's very unlinked, let's say, to to the original to the original Bitcoin that you got. So like so, like like, coin join is not coin join is not the only game in town.
没错,我完全同意。尤其是有了保密交易功能后,我认为在Liquid网络上无需协议升级就能实现很多酷炫功能。
Yeah. Right. No. I agree. And especially with confidential transactions, I think it can there's be a lot of cool things you can do on the liquid side without protocol change.
确实。现在有了真正可用的Liquid钱包,我的思路完全打开了。因为之前阻碍Liquid普及的主要原因就是缺乏好用的用户界面,而现在我们
Yep. That my mind is really racing now that there's actually a very usable liquid wallet. Because that was one of the main things stopping liquid usability was there was just no good user facing stuff and now we
这就是网络效应啊老兄。而且这种效应是指数级增长的——Bolt的Breeze钱包、Bolt团队,某种程度上Aqua团队和其他团队都不约而同地在同一时间得出了相同结论,大概是在比特币亚特兰蒂斯会议期间(就是马德拉岛那个会议),当时我们聚在一起,很多开发者都决定要朝这个方向发力。所以现在Liquid的网络效应在增长,而ARK的网络效应增长得更快。目前至少有六家比特币公司正在构建ARK方案。
have It's a network effect, man. And the thing is like, it's kind of exponential because what happened is Bolt's Breeze, Bolt, and to some degree also the Aqua team and some other teams kind of like all gravitated towards the same conclusion at the same time, which was around the time, by the way of Bitcoin Atlantis, the conference in Madeira where we all kind of got together and we were like A lot of the builders were like, this is what we're gonna do. This is the model that So there's like the network effect of liquid is growing, but the network effect of arcades is also growing really quick, man. You'll have a look at that there's at least six Bitcoin companies right now that are building an ARC.
我觉得很多钱包(包括你们的)把闪电网络作为互操作层是很明智的。这样更容易推广,不必过度依赖网络效应——你们可以在Liquid上部署ARK方案,但用户最终仍通过闪电网络收发款项。我有个问题:使用支持Liquid的闪电网络钱包最大的妥协在于小额交易,这个我们还没深入讨论过。
And I think the fact that a lot of wallets, including yourself, using Lightning as kind of the interoperable layer. It is easy to have. You don't have to fight the network effect as much because you can drop in ARK where liquid is, and at the end of the day, they're still paying and receiving from Lightning. I have a question for you. The biggest trade off with using a liquid enabled Lightning Wallet is small We haven't really talked about it.
就是小额交易问题,因为必须进行Liquid链上交易。我记得很多钱包(可能包括你们的)设置了一千聪的最低收款限额,但人们总爱发送几聪的小额支付。另外第二个问题是目前不支持闪电网络地址,你怎么看这个问题?
It's small transactions because you do have to make the liquid transactions. Sending I think a lot of lots, maybe yours even included, like, you can't receive a payment under a thousand SAPs, which people for whatever reason love sending like free SAP payments. So, you have that. But the second piece is you don't have Lightning Address Support. How do you think about that?
我们会做到的。我们会做到的。我要让它实现。直接发货就行了吗?
We will. We will. I'm gonna I'm gonna make it happen. Just gonna ship it?
我他妈的一定要把它发出去。
I'm gonna fucking ship it.
我是说,有没有人担心这个怎么运作?你是要运行一个服务器来保存流动地址还是什么?这是怎么运作的?
I'm Is there is there a concern that like, how does that work? Are you gonna be running basically a server that is like holding liquid addresses or something? How does that work?
是的,它会是一个目录服务器。对吧?所以,这并不完全无需信任。这里涉及更多的信任假设,但作为一家公司,我们能做的就是运行一个闪电服务器,基本上你给我们一个流动地址,我想是一个地址。要么是俱乐部地址,要么是一个普通地址。
Yeah, it's gonna be directory server. Right? So, and that is not as trustless. There's more trust assumption involved there, but what we can do as like a company is we can run a lightning server and basically you give us like a liquid, I guess an add Either liquid address. Either an club or one address.
说实话,可能只用一个地址更好。我认为地址复用可能比x俱乐部泄露要好。
It's probably better if it's just one address. I think address reuse is probably better than x club leak, to be perfectly honest.
所以,我在想,每次我打开钱包时,你能不能给我发一个地址。或者发给我100个地址。
So Couldn't couldn't I was thinking like every time I open the wallet You can send me an address. Or send you like a 100 addresses.
是的。是的。我们可以锁定100个地址。是的。但基本上,会发生的是,我会在发送者和你的地址之间创建一个交换
Yeah. Yeah. We we can we can lock 100 addresses. Yeah. But basically, what would happen is like, I would create a swap between the sender and your address
是的。
Yeah.
作为接收方,我们将作为主办方,就像...
As the receiver and we would be hosting like And
两边都给。
give it to both.
没错。确切地说,不是用我的节点作为服务器运营商创建闪电网络发票,而是与Bolt服务器创建交换。这不像正规Bolt交换那样完全无需信任。在交换过程中有极短的时间窗口理论上可能存在风险,不过...
Yeah. Exactly. And instead of creating a lightning network invoice with my node as the server operator, I get a I create a swap with the Bolt server. It's not it's not as fully trustless as a proper Bolt swap. There's like a tiny amount of time in between that swap where a rug can technically happen, not
不完全...你可能会中间人攻击,提供一个你控制的Liquid地址。对,类似这种控制。
fully You could probably man in the middle, you could give a liquid address that you control Yeah. Sort of like control.
是的。我觉得这挺有意思。我需要更深入了解一下。
Yeah. There's like Which I think is fun. I need to get a little deeper into that.
我只是想让人们能在odalabullbigclone.com上付款,你知道,就是图个方便。如果需要更高安全性,我会给他们正式发票。
I just want people to be able to pay me at a odalabullbigclone.com, you know, like, it's just a convenience thing. And if I need if I need more security, then I'll give them an actual invoice.
嗯,关于Liquid的事情是这样的,我们实际上已经降低了Liquid上的费用。也就是说,是的。我们可以在中心化网络上操作,所以Liquid上的费用是每V字节0.01聪,
Well, the thing the thing on Liquid is like we actually dropped the fees on Liquid. Like, is Yeah. Can We just do things on the centralized network So which is the fees on Liquid is 0.01 SAT per V byte and
这大约是33聪的交易费。
It's like 33 SATs of transactions.
对于保密交易来说,其体积大约是普通交易的20倍,我想我们说的是3000 V字节。因此,是的,普通交易是33聪,而这个是零。对吧?所以在Liquid上非保密的普通交易基本上是免费的。我们之所以不做低于1000聪的交换交易,是因为一次交换涉及两笔链上交易和两笔链上保密交易。
For a confidential transaction, which is like 20 times bigger than a regular transaction, I think we're talking about 3,000 V bytes. Therefore, yes, 33 sets for a regular transaction, it's zero. Right? So a regular transaction on liquid that's not confidential is basically free. And the reason why we don't do swaps under a thousand SATs is because a swap transaction involves two on chain transactions and two on chain confidential transactions.
比如使用Bolts进行的Bull Bitcoin交换,如果你愿意的话,我们也可以不使用保密交易,但我认为值得。那将是6000字节,也就是60聪。对吧?大约66聪左右,这个嘛,我不确定。我们可以,嗯。
So like bull Bitcoin swaps using bolts, which we could not use confidential transactions if you wanted to, but I think it's worth it. That will be 6,000 bytes, therefore 60 SATs. Right? 66 SATs around that, which is like, I don't know, man. Like, we could yeah.
我的意思是,这大约是1000聪交易的6%。所以不算太好。但没有什么能阻止我们做,比如在Liquid上进行静默支付。我们可以做到。
I mean, it's like 6% of a thousand SAT transactions. So it's like not great. But there's nothing stopping us from doing, for example, silent payments on liquid. We could do that.
是的。我们
Yeah. We
可以做很多事情。对吧?只要我们想,至少链上应用肯定可以,因为我们想要的用户体验是,比如,我在Waddell支付,而Waddell是一个Nostril账号。所以我的Bull Bitcoin钱包,很明显,我们会在Bull Bitcoin钱包里集成Nostril。
could do a bunch of things. Right? We can just do that if we So want definitely, at least on chain, I wanna have the on chains apps with because the the UX that we want is like, yeah, I I pay at Waddell and then at Waddell is a Nostril handle. So my Bull Bitcoin wallet, which I very obviously, we're gonna have Nostril in the Bull Bitcoin wallet.
是啊。
Yeah.
原因有很多。首先,我想在Bull Bitcoin上建立私人群聊。没错。因为当你向某人付款时,你也在和对方交流。
For for many reasons. First of all, I wanna have private group chats Yeah. In in Bull Bitcoin. Yep. Because when you are paying someone, you are also talking with that person.
对。比如说我想给你付款,你肯定会给我发个收款地址之类的。
Right. Whether because let's say I wanna pay you. I mean, you're gonna be like I'm gonna like sending an address.
这是人之常情。你知道吗?大约80%的点对点交易都是在WhatsApp之类的平台上完成的。
It's a human condition. It's like what? It's like 80% of P2P trays are happening on WhatsApp or something.
是啊,当然。
Yeah, of course.
人们就是想聊天而已。
People just want to chat.
没错,当然。所以你希望这些对话能保密。还有些很酷的功能,显然下一个前沿是多签技术,不过我从来不是个人多签的粉丝,
Yeah, of course. So you want that to be confidential. There's also cool things. Obviously, next frontier is multisig. So I've never been a individual multisig fan,
喜欢
like
多重签名钱包我自己从来不是粉丝。但随着Minuscript带来的新技术,现在是时候重新审视多重签名体验了。我真正想做的是我自己会用的东西。我最大的羞耻是使用BitPay钱包。
multisig yourself, never been a fan. But I think now with the technologies that are arriving with Minuscript, now is the time to, like, have a refresh at the multisig experience. And what I really want to do is something that I use personally. My greatest shame is that I use the BitPay wallet.
Copay,对吧?
Copay, right?
它以前叫Copay,现在就叫BitPay多重签名钱包,因为是原始的多重签名钱包。因为bull Bitcoin,我们部分预算以比特币形式存在。当Madex搞这些疯狂噱头时,我们有预算可以动用。
It used to be called Copay, now it's just called BitPay for Multisig because The original Multisig wallet. The original Multisig wallet because bull Bitcoin, have some of our budget is in Bitcoin. Right? So, you know, like when when Madex does these crazy, like stunts, you know, that that that for bull Bitcoin, you know, we have we have a budget. We we call it that we can just do things budget.
这是个多重签名钱包。为确保没人用那笔预算做蠢事,我们设置了多重签名。
And it's a multisig wallet. And and in order to make sure that nobody does anything too retarded with that budget, we have a multisig.
那你为什么不用Sparrow呢?
And why don't you use Sparrow for that?
因为你需要移动端?是因为我们要消费
Because you want mobile? It's because we we spend
很多
a lot of
我们经常这样做,对吧?
we we do it all the time. Right?
所以你想要移动端的便利性。
So you want the convenience of mobile.
没错。我会收到BitPay应用的通知,比如:'Madex想花这笔钱去...我不知道...租一辆坦克'。
Yeah. Exactly. I get like a notification on BitPay app, which is like, Madex wants to spend this amount of money to, I don't know, rent a tank.
哦,它就直接给你一个应用内通知。
Oh, and it just gives you gives you an in app notification.
对,附带一条消息。就像...你按一下按钮就行。是的,就是这样。
Yeah. With a message. With like, literally like You press like a brook. Yeah. Exactly.
比如,'弗朗西斯,我要5000美元,我要租辆坦克。对,为了拍视频什么的。'然后我就批准了。所以我想要这个功能胜过白噪音。
Like, Francis, I want $5,000. I'm gonna rent a tank Right. For for a video shoot or something. And I'm like, approve of the night. So I want that over white noise.
没错。我绝对想要在Nassar上实现那个。百分之百。对吧?我想在Nassar上做其他我想做的事。
Yeah. I want that over Nassar. 100%. Right? I wanna do other things in in Nassar I want.
白噪音对此再完美不过了。我就要这个。
White noise will be perfect for that. I want it.
现在还
It's still
早,但以后会... 我希望能够与那些看涨的用户沟通。
early but it'll Like, I wanna be able to communicate with the the bull users.
是啊。
Yeah.
目前不行。作为比特币的看涨操盘手,因为我已经
I can't right now. As as the bull Bitcoin operator because I've
说过我基本上给他们发推送通知。嗯,推送通知。嗯,基本上,
said I send them a push notification basically. Well, push notification. Well, basically,
我能做的是创建一个Nostril作为非常小的——我不想与社交媒体竞争。我想把Nostril用作后端,一个通讯录。对,就是这样。
what I can do is I can create a Nostril as a very small I don't I don't wanna compete with with social media stuff. I wanna use Nostril as a back end. A contact book. Yeah. Yeah.
它就像一个用于联系人等事务的后端通讯网络,但没人能阻止你或我们(显然我们会这么做)生成Nostril密钥对,然后你就能自动关注整个比特币网络,或是自动连接到我的中继站之类。我可以发布消息说'伙计们,我们有更新了'之类的。但我不会推送任何内容给你——是你主动关注我的。当你打开应用时...
It's just like as a back end communications network for contacts and for stuff like that, but there's nothing stopping you or us, which obviously we will do, to generate a Nostril key pair and you're connected to you're automatically following whole Bitcoin or you're automatically connected to to my relay or something like that and I'm saying like, guys, we have an update or something like that. And and you I'm not pushing anything to you. You're following me, I'm not sure. Right. Automatically And you're opening the app and
你会去查看你的
you're going to check your
在应用里我们可以设置:来自这个NPUB地址的任何消息都显示在首页。因为这个NPUB是紧急公告专用号——比如出现漏洞需要更新、停止交易,或是外星人降临之类的重大事件。
And and in the app, we can just say like, hey, any message that's coming from this NPUB, display it on the homepage, right? Because this NPUB is the emergency bullet point NPUB like there's a bug, you need to update, stop transaction, whatever it is or aliens have arrived, whatever it is. It's important
能够以安全的方式与你们沟通很重要。
It's important to be able to communicate with you guys in a secure way.
没错。所以不是搞什么星弧、静默支付那些花哨玩意。我就喜欢这种简洁的方式。
Yeah. So it's not not not not start arcs, silent payments, all that kind of shit. I love it. Like, yeah.
好了。我已经占用你太多时间,你还有事要忙。但在你走之前必须回答:你对Core 30s和Opera Turn有什么看法?
Okay. I don't I've kept you too long already and you have some obligations, but you're not allowed to leave without. What's your opinion on core 30s, opera turn? Oh, well,
顺便说一句,我持有唯一正确的观点。我有
it's such a I have the only correct opinion, by the way. I have the
我注意到你大多数观点的一个特点就是你对那件事的感受。
only I've noticed that about most of your opinions is how you feel about that.
而且...而且它...它...它...它需要非常微妙才能正确。你需要有很多细微差别。我不想打破任何人的幻想,但运行节点并不能...它...它...我的观点带有某种宿命论色彩,就是我们真的无法阻止垃圾信息。这一点已经被比特币界的'小丑'Peter Todd证明了,他创建了Liber Relay并主张'中继一切'。我们要中继一切。
And and it's it's it's it's it's so nuanced in order to be correct. You need to have a lot of nuance. I I don't wanna burst anybody's bubble, but running knots will not it's it's it's there there's there's a certain fatality fatalistic aspect to my opinion, which is there's nothing we can do really to prevent spam. And that was proven by, you know, kind of like the joker of Bitcoin, like Peter Todd, you know, who like created Liber Relay and is like, like Relay all the things. We'll relay all the things.
在此之前,比特币界有一种君子协定,我们有两种机制:策略机制和共识机制。策略机制你可以称之为君子协定。如果有人决定不做君子,你无法强制执行这个协定。而共识层当然
And then before before that, there was a kind of gentleman's agreement in Bitcoin that we have two mechanisms. We have the policy one and we have the consensus one. And the policy one, you can call it a gentleman's agreement. And if someone decides to not be a gentleman, you can't force the agreement on that. Whereas the consensus layer, of course
是硬性规则。
Is the hard rules.
是的。是的。它...它是硬性规则,当然。我对Bitcoin Core有复杂的感觉,我觉得有点奇怪,因为我早期曾是...你知道,Bitcoin Core的某些方面,比如流程...因为像...Bitcoin Core的流程和核心圈子有些东西我不喜欢。是的。
Yeah. Yeah. It's it's the hard the hard rules, of course. And, you know, I I have mixed feelings about Bitcoin Core and I I kinda feel it's kinda weird because I've been in the early camp of, like, you know, there's some things about Bitcoin Core, the the process, because big like, there's something about the Bitcoin Core process and of the Bitcoin Core inner circle that I don't like. Yeah.
绝对有一个小圈子,100%是的。不是每个人的PR都会被合并,有关系确实有帮助。如果你想在Bitcoin Core中推进事情,是核心圈子成员的话,基本上就自动进入了白名单,你的东西就...所以
There's definitely like a click, a little clicky A 100%. Yeah. Aspect to it and not everybody's PRs get merged and it it helps to be friends. Yeah. If you want to get things shipped in Bitcoin Core and you're part of the inner circle, you kind of like get, automatically you whitelisted, but your stuff is so So
有快速通道。
there's fast track.
是啊,你是快速通道。有些东西我不喜欢。具体来说,关于比特币核心30版本,最让我恼火的是他们移除了那个功能——这真是个非常小众的问题。
Yeah. You're fast track. There's like things that I don't like. Specifically about Bitcoin Core 30, by the way, which really sucks is they removed That was the thing that I that pissed me off the most. Really niche thing.
他们移除了对旧版钱包的支持,不再支持将比特币地址和私钥导入比特币核心钱包。这意味着我们不会升级到比特币核心30版本,因为我们的开源比特币后端Cypher节点依赖旧版钱包功能。这确实挺糟心的。不过比特币本身没问题。他们这么做的理由是什么?我猜是为了代码清理之类的?
They removed support for legacy wallets. They removed support for importing Bitcoin addresses and private keys into a Bitcoin Core wallet, which means that we will not be updating to Bitcoin Core 30 because part of Cypher node, like our open source Bitcoin backend relies on that to work, relies on legacy wallets, so that kind of sucks. But Bitcoin's fine. Bitcoin's What was their argument for that? I'm assuming it's because They'll clean up or something?
对,我猜是他们不想再维护这部分代码了。不过也没关系。
Yeah. I'm assuming it's that they don't don't wanna work. They don't wanna maintain it. Yeah. And it's fine.
反正我不需要他们更新,我可以一直用29.2版本。29.2版本引入了0.1聪/字节的低费率限制——你肯定喜欢这个改动吧?我他妈爱死这个改动了。
Like, I don't need them to make I can run, you know, 29.2 forever. Yeah. 29.2 introduces the 0.1 stats per or the lower side byte limit. You like that change. I fucking love it, man.
我简直爱死它了。要是矿工们...你知道的,我不想看到人为定价...那简直就是共产主义懂吗?就像加拿大对枫糖浆搞的价格管制。
I fucking love it. Like, if the miners if there's you know, I don't wanna have an artificial price for for Yeah. That's that's communism. Know? That's what we have in Canada with the price of fucking maple syrup.
你懂我意思吧?他们设置了人为的最低限价之类的。手续费降低我当然高兴。但问题是,如果我从来没听说过比特币核心的OpReturn争议,这事其实根本不会影响我的生活,对吧?
You know what I mean? There's a an artificial price floor on it or something like that. I'm I'm happy that the fees are fees are getting low. But the thing is, like, if I had never heard of the Bitcoin Core OpReturn debate, it would still have not affected my life. Right?
当然,我不喜欢垃圾信息。我绝对不希望比特币上出现这些。我不喜欢垃圾币。我不希望有些人想把垃圾币放到比特币上。他们就是特别想要这样。
So of course, like, I don't I don't like spam. Of course, I don't want it to be on Bitcoin. I don't like shitcoins. I don't like I don't I don't want some people want the shitcoins to be on Bitcoin. Like, they specifically want that.
比如,我完全不想要
Like, I don't want that at
一点。我也是。
all. Same.
我是个货币本位派的比特币支持者。我认为比特币区块链不是通用数据库,它是金融货币交易数据库。这就是我希望它保持的样子。它就是钱。
I'm a monetary Bitcoiner. You know, I think the Bitcoin blockchain is not a general purpose database. It's it's a financial it's monetary transaction database. So that's what I want it to be. It's money.
它就是钱。但不幸的是,决定它是什么不取决于我,而是取决于共识机制。除非进行软分叉或硬分叉,否则我们无能为力。
It is money. But unfortunately, it's not up to me to decide what it is. It's up to the the the consensus to decide and short of a soft fork or a hard fork even maybe, there's nothing we can do.
真的有能阻止它的分叉吗?我是说,你显然可以提高回报率,但
Is there even a really a fork that could stop it? I mean, you could obviously move up return, but
你依然会有垃圾币和比特币。这肯定会变成一场打地鼠游戏,等我们做完后,比如说但是
you still have shit claims and Bitcoin. I mean, there would certainly be a whack a mole game where after we do, let's say But
你无法真正实现打地鼠式的软件修复。所以软件修正起来极其困难。确实如此。我觉得人们有点被惯坏了。我们并没有那么多软分叉,但仅有的几次软分叉已经让人们变得娇惯了。
you can't really do whack a mole software. So the software is super difficult to Correct. Correct. And I think people have gotten a little bit spoiled. We haven't had that many soft forks, but people have gotten spoiled with the soft forks that we have.
他们没有意识到,首先,根本无法提前确认是否达成共识。你只能凭感觉行事,以为存在共识。但如果实际上有相当一部分人不同意,事后就可能出现反向的链分裂。
They don't realize that, first of all, there's no really way to know if there's consensus ahead of time. You're kind of winging it. You feel like there's consensus. And if a significant portion if there isn't consensus, you could have an inverted chain split after the fact.
是啊,当然。
Yeah. Of course.
当然。那将是一片混乱。虽然对个人来说还好——如果你持有自托管资金,大可以安心睡觉。但对企业运营来说,这他妈会让人抓狂。
Of course. Which would just be chaotic. It'd be fine. Everyone you could go to sleep and be fine if you have your funds in self custody. If you're running businesses and stuff, it'd be a fucking pain in the ass.
确实。从美学角度讲,我其实希望完全没有垃圾交易。对,最好什么都不存在。
Yeah. Yeah. So, aesthetically, I'm kind of like, I wish there was no spam. Yeah. I wish there was nothing.
另外,我觉得比特币核心的开发流程也有问题。不过话说回来,比特币核心确实推出了很多优秀的技术,包括我们将需要的许多功能。我现在越来越倾向于认为,某种形式的信心机制是比特币需要的。其实我对契约功能从未完全排斥,就像当初对待Taproot一样——现在通过Arc就能看出,Taproot确实能实现很多功能...Arc就是基于Taproot的,对吧?
And then, you know, I also feel like there's something wrong with the Bitcoin Core process. But at the same time, Bitcoin Core does ship really nice things and a lot of the technologies that we're going to need, I mean, I'm not I I I'm I'm getting closer to the belief that that some form of confidence is something that I would like to see on Bitcoin. And the thing is, I've never been fully closed minded against covenants. I was just kinda like with Taproot, it's like with Arc, now it's like, oh, you can actually use Taproot to be so so so Arc is a Taproot thing. Right?
没错。Taproot...我原本对它非常怀疑,因为根本没人用这玩意儿。只有那些山寨币在用它,简直蠢透了。
Yeah. The Taproot is and I was like very skeptical of Taproot because like, no. Nobody is fucking using Taproot. Like, the shitcoiners are using Taproot. It's fucking retarded.
我们为什么需要Taproot?关键在于Bolt实际上将Taproot用于退款路径,这很棒。Bolt以一种非常巧妙的方式实现了Taproot。所以我就想,实际上Bolt比特币现在已经是Taproot用户了,而Arc则完全基于Taproot。于是我就觉得,Arc团队所做的那些事,某种程度上来说确实挺合理的。
Why did we even need Taproot? The thing is Bolt actually uses Taproot for the refund path, which is great. So Bolt actually implemented Taproot in a really nice way. So I was like, actually, Bolt Bitcoin is now a Taproot user and with Arc, Arc is just full Taproot. So I'm like, okay, what the guys on Arc have done, it's kind of like, okay, right.
尽管开放了一些攻击途径,但我们确实通过那条路线获得了arc。对吧?然后再加上...
So despite opening up some attack vector, we did gain arc with that route. Right? And then with And with
这种攻击途径就像是更廉价的垃圾信息攻击,对吧?
the attack vector is like cheaper spam, right?
对,对。之前有过铭文漏洞利用的情况,虽然理论上一直存在可能,但显然被...
Yeah. Yeah. There was the inscriptions exploit which was always possible quote quote but obviously made
大幅降低了成本,对吧?
Significantly cheaper, Right?
没错,没错。这使得垃圾信息的门槛变低了,或者说在Taproot下,垃圾信息的阻碍某种程度上被削弱了。不是完全消除,但确实有所减弱。
Yeah. Yeah. And it made the the barrier to spam difficult or the barrier to spam was, like, reduced, let's call it, with with Taproot somewhat. Not not fully, but somewhat.
他们可以,他们可以...
They could they could
反正已经发过垃圾信息了。我只是没有那个群组的过渡工具。但我认为,我们核心团队能做到,这是那种只有核心团队才能交付的东西,其他人很难做到。比如说,要在比特币上建立信心是非常非常棘手的。就连核心开发者和比特币开发者们普遍也不同意。
have spammed anyway. I'm just segway without that group. But so I think, like, we core core can and this is the kind of thing that that core can ship that that very few other people can ship. Like, let's say, to ship confidence onto Bitcoin is something that's very, very tricky. And even the core devs and and Bitcoin devs in general, like, don't agree.
当我们实现它时,那可是硬核玩意儿,老兄。这就像是...能有一群硬核协议加密专家来交付这个东西,真的很棒。所以,这可能意味着要升级到比特币核心30版本,直到我们修复问题。有趣的是...
And when we implement it, it's it's hardcore shit, man. It's like it's it's and so having having, like, hardcore protocol crypto experts able to deliver that thing is is is nice. So, that could be upgrading to Bitcoin Core 30 until we've fixed. What's funny
你只需要在Cypher节点端工作,移除对旧版钱包的依赖。
You just got do work on the Cypher node side to remove the legacy wallet dependency.
是啊。你知道接下来要怎么做...给
Yeah. And you know what's going Give
我们一些时间来完成这件事。
us some time to do that.
我的意思是,反正我迟早都要做的。最终我们都会转向其他方案。但你知道,这就是我的核心观点——争论已经结束了。
I mean, I was gonna do that anyway. Eventually, I was gonna we were gonna switch to other stuff eventually. But, you know, yeah. That's that's the essence of my opinion is that it's it's over. The debate's over.
明白吗?君子协定已经被打破,事实就是如此。
You know? The gentleman's agreement was broken and that's what it is.
是的。我认为我的观点与您高度一致。这个话题我已经深入讨论了一年多。这期间经历了大规模DDoS攻击。但话说回来,人们如此关注比特币其实是件好事。
Yeah. I think I'm pretty much completely aligned on your opinion. And I've talked about this just at length for almost over a year now. Just been a massive DDoS in my time. But look, it's good that people care about Bitcoin so much.
我认为冷漠会导致消亡。对比特币而言,冷漠可能是最大的风险。简单来说,当我们启动OpenSats时,最担心的就是存在某种——或许这个词太重了——但感觉像是近亲繁殖的资金渠道和小圈子。我们希望通过OpenSats开辟新路径,更独立、更透明、更开放。
I think we die based on apathy. Apathy is probably the single biggest risk to Bitcoin. Just real quick. So when we launched OpenSets, this was the main concern we had, was the there was a very maybe it's too strong of a word, but it felt kind of like incestuous funding path and core group. And we thought OpenSats could do something different and be more independent and be more transparent and be more open.
是的。我认为我们确实实现了这个目标。我们已经发放了300多项资助,真正在努力扩大生态多样性。
Yeah. And and I think we've really accomplished that goal. We've provided over 300 grants. Like, really just try to broaden the pie. Yeah.
其中绝大多数资助并非用于协议开发。比如我们现在是BTC Pay服务器最大支持者。还支持了大量现金应用、各类移动钱包以及PayJoin开发。
And a lot of that the overwhelming majority of that isn't for protocol work. Yeah. It's for us you know, we're the largest supporter of BTC Pay server now. Mhmm. We've done a lot of cash use support, tons of different mobile wallets, PayJoin.
是的。我们协助他们成立了自己的非营利组织。这正是我们希望看到的百花齐放局面。无论好坏,我们已取得巨大成功,现在成为领域内的主导力量。
Yeah. We help them start up their their in their nonprofit. They have their own nonprofit And that's one of the things you wanna see, like, a thousand flowers bloom. But for better or for worse, we found basically massive success, and now we're the heavyweight in the room. Yeah.
因此我受到不少批评,这很正常。需要说明的是,OpenSats的设计机制中,我只是九票中的一票,无法单方面推动决策。
And so I'm getting a lot of flack, which is fine. Like, I understand, you know, people and and to be clear, the way we designed OpenSets is that I'm just one vote of nine votes. Yeah. Yeah. So, like, I can't unilaterally push things through.
但现在出现新论调,认为这种资助开发者的方式本身就有问题。您对OpenSats未来发展有什么建议?比特币在这方面应该采取什么最佳路径?
But do you have any there's a new narrative of just funding any developers this way is bad. Do you have any recommendations or opinions on how we proceed with OpenSats? What's the best path for Bitcoin going forward on that front?
我认为OpenSats填补了一个非常必要的叙事和运营空间,即协议开发者们致力于改进比特币,而你可以开发其他类型的软件,这些并非协议开发,就像你提到的那样。在OpenSaaS之前,如果你想资助比特币,基本上就是资助比特币核心开发者。而OpenSaaS的意义在于资助应用层开发——这正是我最感兴趣的领域。真希望有更多私营企业也这么做,对吧?
I think OpenSats filled a very much needed narrative and an operational space, which is that the protocol devs were, like there to improve Bitcoin, you you you can do other types of software, which is not protocol development, like like the ones that you named. And before OpenSaaS, I think like the the the Bitcoin core if you wanted to to fund the Bitcoin, you would just fund Bitcoin core devs and what OpenSaaS is was fund the application layer, which is the one that I'm most interested in. You know, I wish there was more private companies Same. Doing that. Right?
我想说,最让我自豪的一点是我们所有的软件都是自筹资金开发的。比如被许多新钱包采用的Bolts Rust库就是我们做的。我们维护了大量开源软件,PayJoin项目也是我自掏腰包让开发者参与的,我还提供过像Joynster这样的小型私人资助。真希望更多人能这样做,但显然他们并没有。
And like, I will say that that's one of my biggest my pride is that like all of the software that we do is funded by us, right? So like the Bolts Rust library, which is used by a bunch of new wallets, that's us. We maintain a bunch of open source software. PayJoin, I paid my devs to work on PayJoin, I financed, I did like little private grants like Joynster and like a bunch of shit like that. I wish a lot of more people would do it, but apparently, they don't.
其实我有点担心自己在与OpenSaaS竞争员工资源。不过现状如此。
I am actually kinda like a little concerned that I'm competing with OpenSaaS for employees. But it is what it is.
但你给他们的报酬比人们想象的要低。我们故意不公开最高资助金额,因为大家都会冲着最高金额申请。但其实数额并不高。
You pay them less than people realize though. Yeah, yeah, We intentionally don't publicly say what our highest grant amount is because people would just apply for the highest. Yeah. But it's not that high.
是啊,确实不算高。但Bull Bitcoin也不是风投公司,我们...
Yeah. Mean, it's not that high. But Bull Bitcoin is also not a VC funded company. We have Yeah.
但这是道德选择,我喜欢这种理念。
But that's an ethical I like the choice. Yeah.
我觉得Bull Bitcoin的开发者们其实都降薪了。不过...
I think a Bull lot Bitcoin devs take a pay cut. But
我也想说,看,我的梦想和你的梦想相似,因为我实际上必须作为志愿者出去筹款,这是不可持续的。我认为让私营企业来做这件事更具可持续性,而且我是个资本家。这就是1031方介入的原因。对吧?因为我们是少数真正投资全开源堆栈公司的风投之一,比如Start Nine或Mempool。
I would also say, look, my dream is similar to your dream because I actually have to go out there as a volunteer and try and raise donations, which is not sustainable. And I think it's much more sustainable and I'm a capitalist to have private companies doing this. And that's where the ten thirty one side comes in. Right? Because we're one of the few VCs that actually fund full open source stack companies like Start Nine or Mempool.
Space、Primal。那里的梦想实际上是可持续盈利的企业,同时为开源做贡献。在这方面我还想说,虽然我非常尊重你们是完全自筹资金运营的,但作为一个专注于比特币的开源风投,这里的资金也并不充裕。
Space, Primal. And the dream there is like actually sustainable profitable businesses that contribute to open source. And I would just say on that front too, while I really respect that you're a completely bootstrapped operation, as a Bitcoin focused open source VC, there's also not that much money there either.
不,不。对。是的。是的。
No. No. Right. Yeah. Yeah.
不,不。当然。当然。
No. No. For sure. For sure.
Lightspark的种子轮融资不是1.65亿。对。对。对。不。
It's not Lightspark's a 165,000,000 Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. No. On the seed round.
而且说清楚一点,我很喜欢你们在做的事,至于那些喷子,他们可以滚蛋。你知道,如果你什么都没做出来,你的意见对我来说毫无意义。对吧?而且你们虽然没有直接开发具体产品,但你们在赋能开发者。是的。
And and to be very clear, like, I love what you guys are doing and, you know, fuck the haters go with they could go fuck themselves. It's you know, if you're not if you're not building anything, your opinion matters very little to me. Right? And like, you know, you guys are not specifically building shit, but you're you're you're you're enabling builders. Yeah.
比如PayJone就是个很好的例子。我们对它贡献了一点,但PayJone从V0到V1再到V2,再到V2发布后升级到V3,总共需要四到五年的努力,需要不知道多少人手。而要升级到V3还需要两三个甚至四个几乎全职的人手。即使对BullBit这样的公司来说,全额资助PayJone也超出了我的预算,我还要照顾其他员工。所以很多这些事情本不会发生。
And like, you know, there's a really good example, for example, is PayJone. Like, PayJone is a great example where, like, we contributed a little bit to it, but for Page On to go from V zero to V one to V two to the release of V two to go to V three, like, that's a four to five year effort in total that required I don't know how many people and to go to v three is gonna also take like, you know, two to three to four, like, almost like full time people to, like, to get there. And even for a company like BullBit, it's like it's above my budgets to fund the entire page on the thing. I have other employees that I have to take care of. So a lot of these things wouldn't happen.
像街机这类东西,谁知道他们怎么赚钱。这非常非常实验性。但我认为开源软件确实有利可图。Pol Bitcoin很幸运拥有该领域唯一盈利的商业模式,就是比特币经纪业务。买进卖出比特币。
And even stuff like arcade and who knows how they're going to make money. It's very, very experimental. But I think that there is money to be made in open source software. We're very fortunate at Pol Bitcoin that we have the only profitable business model in the space, which is like Bitcoin brokerage. Buy, sell Bitcoin.
对,买卖比特币。收取合理费用。没错。还有其他方式,但主要就是...然后我们把开源当作营销工具来用。
Yeah, buy or sell Bitcoin. Charge a reasonable fee. Yeah, exactly. And there's others, but mostly that's the And then we use I use open source as a marketing tool.
是啊。
Yeah.
对吧?当然不只是为了这个。我做这些是出于自尊心、自豪感,也是真心想为比特币做点贡献。
Right? So and it's not just for that, obviously. Like, do it because I do it because, like, out of ego, out of pride, out of there is sincere desire to help Bitcoin and to do something.
这里就是我们坚守的阵地。对吧?开源软件是
And it's where we hold the line. Right? Source software is
我们坚守的阵地。
where we hold the line.
对,没错。这是基础。是自由运动的核心。
Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. It's foundational. It's the core of the freedom movement.
是啊是啊,当然。而且说实话真的很有趣。作为一个跟政府、银行打过交道还运营过比特币交易所的人,每天面对的就是没完没了的问题。每天醒来一打开手机,全是问题、问题、问题。但开源让我发现了一片真正令人满足的纯粹创作天地——在开源开发中你可以为所欲为,不需要任何人的许可,天空才是他妈的极限。
Yeah, yeah, of course. And it's also really fun, to be perfectly honest. As someone who's dealt with governments and banks and running a Bitcoin exchange, it's just an endless endless stream of problems. Every day I wake up, I open my phone and it's just like problem, problem, problem, problem. But what I have found with open source is this really satisfying, purely creative, unrestrained you can do anything in open source development and you don't need to ask anybody's permission and the sky is the fucking limit.
软件就是魔法。我越是探索开源软件,就越感到快乐。对我来说,从事开源工作就像是能让我咽下法币世界运营交易所这坨屎的良药。至少知道每天有一半时间会很有趣——就是我和开源办公桌共度的时光。
Software is magic. The more I discover open source software, the more I'm just happy. So working for me, working in open source software is what allows me to swallow the shit of the fiat world of running a change. It's knowing that at least half of my day is going to be interesting, which is the half of my day where I'm working with the open source desk.
太棒了。弗朗西斯,这感觉真好。我们应该多来几次这样的交流。
I love it. Francis, this is great. Let's do this more often.
没错,老兄。好的。没问题。
Yeah. Totally, man. Okay. Yeah.
我们上楼去拿点东西吧。
Let's get some upstairs.
非常感谢,兄弟。好的。
Thanks so much, man. Alright.
怪胎们,希望你们喜欢这段内容。希望我在卢加诺期间能多录些现场即兴。也许不会。不确定。但请继续关注Stacks动态。
Freaks, I hope you enjoyed that. Hopefully, I'll get some more in person rips while I'm here in Lugano. Maybe I won't. Not sure. But stay on the stacks hats.
和平。
Peace.
关于 Bayt 播客
Bayt 提供中文+原文双语音频和字幕,帮助你打破语言障碍,轻松听懂全球优质播客。